Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for May, 2011

In Part One I made the observation: If the atmosphere has an invariant optical thickness then surely all molecules should be included? Meaning all ‘radiatively-active’ gases. Then I cited some results from Collins (2006) on the ‘radiative forcing’ for other gases, and added: ..So if total optical thickness from CO2 and water vapor has stayed [...]

Read Full Post »

In previous articles in this series we looked at a number of issues first in Miskolczi’s 2010 paper and then in the 2007 paper. The author himself has shown up and commented on some of these points, although not all, and sadly decided that we are not too bright and a little bit too critical [...]

Read Full Post »

In Part Two we looked at the claimed relationship ED=AA in Miskolczi’s 2007 paper. Ed = downward atmospheric radiation absorbed by the surface Aa = surface radiation absorbed in the atmosphere I showed that they could not be exactly equal. Ferenc Miskolczi himself has just joined the discussion and confirmed: I think I was the first [...]

Read Full Post »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 121 other followers