https://scienceofdoom.com/2023/11/21/extreme-weather-17-modeling-tropical-cyclones/2025-12-02T02:09:59+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2023/10/25/extreme-weather-16-modeling-tropical-cyclones/2023-10-25T02:42:30+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2023/10/20/extreme-weather-15-modeling-tropical-cyclones/2023-10-20T23:53:16+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2023/10/16/natural-variability-attribution-and-climate-models-12/2023-10-16T23:29:45+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2023/10/10/natural-variability-attribution-and-climate-models-11/2023-10-20T08:17:48+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2023/10/09/natural-variability-attribution-and-climate-models-10-more-on-droughts/2023-10-09T00:35:31+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2023/08/13/natural-variability-attribution-and-climate-models-9/2023-08-13T06:26:49+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2023/07/31/natural-variability-attribution-and-climate-models-8/2023-07-31T06:10:00+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2023/07/22/natural-variability-attribution-and-climate-models-7/2023-07-22T08:52:37+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2023/07/17/natural-variability-attribution-and-climate-models-6/2023-07-17T22:43:57+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2023/06/12/natural-variability-attribution-and-climate-models-5/2023-06-12T05:54:00+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2023/05/25/natural-variability-attribution-and-climate-models-4/2023-05-25T21:25:22+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2023/05/25/natural-variability-attribution-and-climate-models-3/2023-05-25T04:16:27+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2023/04/27/natural-variability-attribution-and-climate-models-2/2023-05-10T14:46:23+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2023/04/18/natural-variability-attribution-and-climate-models-1/2023-04-18T08:30:40+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2023/04/13/extreme-weather-14-trends-in-extreme-hot-and-cold-days-nights/2023-04-13T20:20:11+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2023/04/12/summary-on-trends-in-droughts/2023-04-12T20:43:42+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2023/04/05/extreme-weather-13-trends-in-droughts-more-greening/2023-04-05T22:59:01+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2023/04/05/extreme-weather-12-trends-in-droughts-soil-moisture-rainfall-evaporation/2023-04-05T08:53:44+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2023/04/05/extreme-weather-11-trends-in-droughts-rainfall/2023-04-05T05:30:21+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2023/03/30/extreme-weather-10-trends-in-droughts-overview/2023-03-30T08:15:49+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2023/03/24/summary-on-trends-in-extreme-rainfall-and-floods-and-missing-good-news/2023-04-01T00:33:15+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2023/03/22/extreme-weather-9-trends-in-floods-streamflow/2023-03-22T01:16:27+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2023/03/20/extreme-weather-8-trends-in-floods/2023-03-20T21:04:30+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2023/03/17/extreme-weather-7-trends-in-extreme-rainfall/2023-03-17T20:29:02+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2023/03/14/summary-on-trends-in-tropical-cyclones-missing-good-news/2023-03-14T18:25:33+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2023/03/11/extreme-weather-6-trends-in-poleward-migration-of-tropical-cyclones/2023-03-11T01:15:01+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2023/03/08/extreme-weather-5-trends-in-intensification-rates-of-tropical-cyclones/2023-03-09T08:50:32+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2023/03/06/extreme-weather-4-trends-in-rainfall-in-tropical-cyclones/2023-03-06T09:48:32+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2023/03/05/extreme-weather-3-trends-in-translation-speed-of-tropical-cyclones/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/kossin-slowdown-of-tcs-2019.pngkossin-slowdown-of-tcs-2019https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/kossin-revised-slowdown-of-tcs-2018-1.pngkossin-revised-slowdown-of-tcs-2018-1https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/kossin-revised-slowdown-of-tcs-2018.pngkossin-revised-slowdown-of-tcs-2018https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/chan-tropical-cyclone-speed-2019.pngchan-tropical-cyclone-speed-2019https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/lanzante-tc-translation-speed-2019-1.pnglanzante-tc-translation-speed-2019-1https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/lanzante-tc-translation-speed-2019.pngLanzante-TC-translation-speed-20192023-03-05T01:00:13+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2023/02/26/extreme-weather-1-long-term-trends-in-frequency-and-intensity-of-landfalling-tropical-cyclones/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/knutson-2019-landfalling-tcs-australia-us-japan.pngknutson-2019-landfalling-tcs-australia-us-japanhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/screen-shot-2023-02-23-at-12.57.08-pm.pngscreen-shot-2023-02-23-at-12.57.08-pm2023-03-02T09:13:19+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2023/02/28/extreme-weather-2-trends-in-frequency-and-intensity-of-tropical-cyclones-out-over-the-ocean/2023-03-10T19:40:52+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2020/06/07/models-and-rainfall-vii-australia-canesm2-csiro-miroc-and-mri-rcp4-5-rcp8-5/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/compare-mpi-miroc-can-csiro-rcp4.5-8.5-2080-2100-v-1979-2005-australia.pngCompare MPI MIROC CAN CSIRO RCP4.5 & 8.5 2080-2100 v 1979-2005 Australiahttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/compare-mpi-miroc-can-csiro-rcp4.5-8.5-djf-2080-2100-v-djf-1979-2005-australia.pngCompare MPI MIROC CAN CSIRO RCP4.5 & 8.5 DJF 2080-2100 v DJF 1979-2005 Australia2022-06-10T10:37:02+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2020/06/07/models-and-rainfall-vi-australia-canesm2-csiro-miroc-and-mri-compared-vs-history/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/compare-gpcc-changes-1979-2005-1891-1910-v-mpi-miroc-can-csiro-australia.pngCompare GPCC changes 1979-2005 % 1891-1910 v MPI MIROC CAN CSIRO Australiahttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/compare-gpcc-changes-djf-1979-2005-djf-1891-1910-v-mpi-miroc-can-csiro-australia.pngCompare GPCC changes DJF 1979-2005 % DJF 1891-1910 v MPI MIROC CAN CSIRO Australia2020-10-22T20:39:46+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2020/06/04/models-and-rainfall-v-canesm2-csiro-miroc-and-mri-compared/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/rcp-4.5-canesm-cf-miroc-cf-mpi-cf-csiro-each-diff-model-historical-global.pngrcp 4.5 CanESM cf Miroc cf MPI cf CSIRO each diff model historical globalhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/rcp-8.5-canesm-cf-miroc-cf-mpi-cf-csiro-each-diff-model-historical-global.pngrcp 8.5 CanESM cf Miroc cf MPI cf CSIRO each diff model historical globalhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/canesm-cf-miroc-cf-mpi-cf-csiro-medians-hist-gpcc.pngCanESM cf Miroc cf MPI cf CSIRO medians hist % GPCC2020-06-08T20:29:08+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2020/06/02/models-and-rainfall-iv-miroc-and-mri-compared/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/miroc-median-1979-2005-gpcc-cf-mpi-global.pngMiroc median 1979-2005 % GPCC cf MPI globalhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/rcp-8.5-miroc-diff-2081-2100-cf-mpi-global.pngrcp 8.5 Miroc diff % 2081-2100 cf MPI globalhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/rcp-8.5-miroc-diff-hist-2081-2100-cf-mpi-global.pngrcp 8.5 Miroc diff hist 2081-2100 cf MPI globalhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/rcp-4.5-miroc-diff-hist-2081-2100-cf-mpi-global.pngrcp 4.5 Miroc diff hist 2081-2100 cf MPI globalhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/rcp-4.5-miroc-hist-2081-2100-cf-mpi-global.pngrcp 4.5 Miroc % hist 2081-2100 cf MPI globalhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/each-rcp-miroc-median-annual-2081-2100-diff-miroc-annual-1979-2005-global.pngEach rcp Miroc median annual 2081-2100 diff Miroc annual 1979-2005 globalhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/each-rcp-miroc-median-annual-2081-2100-abs-200-miroc-annual-1979-2005-global.pngEach rcp Miroc median annual 2081-2100 abs 200 Miroc annual 1979-2005 globalhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/each-rcp-miroc-median-annual-2081-2100-miroc-annual-1979-2005-global.pngEach rcp Miroc median annual 2081-2100 % Miroc annual 1979-2005 global2020-06-02T06:22:40+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2020/05/31/models-and-rainfall-iii-mpi-seasonal/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/mpi-rcp-2.68.5-annual-2080-2099-less-mpi-1979-2005.pngMPI rcp 2.6&8.5 annual 2080-2099 less MPI 1979-2005https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/rcp-2.68.5-annual-2080-2099-less-gpcc-1979-2005.pngrcp 2.6&8.5 annual 2080-2099 less GPCC 1979-2005https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/rcp-2.68.5-djf-2080-2099-less-gpcc-1979-2005.pngrcp 2.6&8.5 DJF 2080-2099 less GPCC 1979-2005https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/djf-1979-2004-mpi-median-diff-gpcc-cf-rcp8.5-rcp2.6-diff-mpi-hist-1.pngDJF 1979-2004 MPI median diff GPCC cf RCP8.5 & RCP2.6 diff MPI histhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/djf-1979-2004-mpi-median-diff-gpcc-cf-rcp8.5-rcp2.6-diff-mpi-hist.pngDJF 1979-2004 MPI median diff GPCC cf RCP8.5 & RCP2.6 diff MPI histhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/all-mpi-mean-djf-1979-2005-diff-gpcc-djf-1979-2005-global-comparison-seasons.pngAll MPI mean DJF 1979-2005 diff GPCC DJF 1979-2005 global comparison seasonshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/each-rcp-mpi-esm-lr-median-jja-2081-2100-perc-all-mpi-jja-1979-2005-global.pngEach rcp MPI-ESM-LR median JJA 2081-2100 perc all MPI JJA 1979-2005 globalhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/each-rcp-mpi-esm-lr-median-jja-2081-2100-diff-all-mpi-jja-1979-2005-global.pngEach rcp MPI-ESM-LR median JJA 2081-2100 diff all MPI JJA 1979-2005 globalhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/each-rcp-mpi-esm-lr-median-jja-2081-2100-abs-all-mpi-jja-1979-2005-global.pngEach rcp MPI-ESM-LR median JJA 2081-2100 abs all MPI JJA 1979-2005 globalhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/each-rcp-mpi-esm-lr-median-djf-2081-2100-abs-all-mpi-djf-1979-2005-global.pngEach rcp MPI-ESM-LR median DJF 2081-2100 abs all MPI DJF 1979-2005 global2020-05-31T23:43:23+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2020/05/29/models-and-rainfall-ii-mpi/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/all-mpi-median-1979-2005-perc-gpcc-1979-2005-europe-1.pngAll MPI median 1979-2005 perc GPCC 1979-2005 Europehttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/all-mpi-median-1979-2005-perc-gpcc-1979-2005-europe.pngAll MPI median 1979-2005 perc GPCC 1979-2005 Europehttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/all-mpi-median-1979-2005-perc-gpcc-1979-2005-global.pngAll MPI median 1979-2005 perc GPCC 1979-2005 globalhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/all-mpi-median-1979-2005-perc-gpcc-1979-2005-australia.pngAll MPI median 1979-2005 perc GPCC 1979-2005 Australiahttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/all-mpi-mean-1979-2005-perc-gpcc-1979-2005-global.pngAll MPI mean 1979-2005 perc GPCC 1979-2005 globalhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/each-mpi-median-2081-2100-rcp-perc-gpcc-1979-2005-australia.pngEach MPI median 2081-2100 rcp perc GPCC 1979-2005 Australiahttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/each-mpi-median-1979-2005-perc-gpcc-1979-2005-global.pngEach MPI median 1979-2005 perc GPCC 1979-2005 globalhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/each-mpi-median-1979-2005-abs-200-gpcc-1979-2005-global.pngEach MPI median 1979-2005 abs 200 GPCC 1979-2005 globalhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/each-rcp-mpi-esm-lr-median-2081-2100-perc-all-mpi-1979-2005-europe.pngEach rcp MPI-ESM-LR median 2081-2100 perc all MPI 1979-2005 Europehttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/each-rcp-mpi-esm-lr-median-2081-2100-perc-all-mpi-1979-2005-australia.pngEach rcp MPI-ESM-LR median 2081-2100 perc all MPI 1979-2005 Australia2020-05-31T22:04:22+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2020/05/26/models-and-rainfall-i/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/ipcc-1.5-rainfall-by-region.pngIPCC 1.5 rainfall by regionGlobal Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Reporthttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/mehran-2014-fig-1.pngMehran 2014 fig 1From Mehran et al 20142020-05-29T09:45:38+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2020/05/16/extracting-rainfall-data-from-cmip5-models/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/screen-shot-2020-05-15-at-9.27.11-pm.pngScreen Shot 2020-05-15 at 9.27.11 pmGPCC Precipitation data provided by the NOAA/OAR/ESRL PSL, Boulder, Colorado, USA, from their Web site at https://psl.noaa.gov/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/screen-shot-2020-05-15-at-9.26.57-pm.pngScreen Shot 2020-05-15 at 9.26.57 pmGPCC Precipitation data provided by the NOAA/OAR/ESRL PSL, Boulder, Colorado, USA, from their Web site at https://psl.noaa.gov/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/screen-shot-2020-05-15-at-10.25.05-pm.pngScreen Shot 2020-05-15 at 10.25.05 pmhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/screen-shot-2020-05-15-at-10.18.36-pm.pngScreen Shot 2020-05-15 at 10.18.36 pm2021-04-19T17:33:48+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2019/03/31/opinions-and-perspectives-9-pattern-effects/2022-01-12T22:06:56+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2019/03/31/opinions-and-perspectives-8-pattern-effects-primer/2019-11-07T11:23:18+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2019/01/10/opinions-and-perspectives-7-global-temperature-change-from-doubling-co2/2021-07-04T13:34:45+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2019/01/08/opinions-and-perspectives-6-climate-models-consensus-myths-and-fudge-factors/2019-12-08T12:24:52+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2019/01/06/opinions-and-perspectives-5-climate-models-and-consensus-myths/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/mehran-rainfall-from-cmip5-v-obserations.pngmehran-rainfall from cmip5 v obserationsFrom Mehran et al 2014https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/screen-shot-2019-01-05-at-7.46.10-pm.pngscreen shot 2019-01-05 at 7.46.10 pmFrom Skeptical Science2019-05-25T21:40:02+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2019/01/03/opinions-and-perspectives-4-climate-models-and-contrarian-myths/2019-09-14T07:48:51+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2018/12/29/opinions-and-perspectives-3-how-much-co2-will-there-be-and-activists-in-disguise/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/ipcc-ar5-co2-concentration-and-changes.pngIPCC AR5 CO2 concentration and changes2021-10-08T07:14:15+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2019/01/01/opinions-and-perspectives-3-5-follow-up-to-how-much-co2-will-there-be/2020-02-01T01:58:49+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2018/12/28/opinions-and-perspectives-2-there-is-more-than-one-proposition-in-climate-science/2020-04-22T19:30:57+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2018/12/27/opinions-and-perspectives-1-the-consensus/2025-04-03T13:06:11+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2018/03/26/californiaknew/2018-07-06T04:06:52+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2018/01/29/models-on-and-off-the-catwalk-part-eight-time-step-and-noise-impact-on-results/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/williams-2012-stochastic-noise-diagram.pngWilliams 2012 stochastic noise diagramFrom Williams et al 2012https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/williams-2012-stochastic-noise-impacts.pngWilliams 2012 stochastic noise impactsFrom Williams et al 2012https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/wang-1999-thc-affected-by-noise.pngWang 1999 - THC affected by noiseFrom Wang et al 19992018-11-27T22:38:56+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2017/12/24/clouds-and-water-vapor-part-eleven-ceppi-et-al-zelinka-et-al/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/ceppi-2017-fig-4-cloud-feedback-breakdown-by-latitude.pngCeppi 2017 fig 4 cloud feedback breakdown by latitudeFrom Ceppi et al 2017https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/ceppi-2017-fig-3-spatial-distribution-of-cloud-feedback.pngCeppi 2017 fig 3 spatial distribution of cloud feedbackFrom Ceppi et al 2017https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/ceppi-2017-fig-2-cloud-feedback-breakdown.pngCeppi 2017 fig 2 cloud feedback breakdownFrom Ceppi et al 2017https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/ceppi-2017-breakdown-of-feedbacks.pngCeppi 2017 breakdown of feedbacksFrom Ceppi et al 2017https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/zelinka-2017-fig-3-comparison-of-ipcc-reports-on-clouds.pngZelinka 2017 fig 3 comparison of IPCC reports on cloudsFrom Zelinka et al 2017https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/zelinka-2017-fig-2-cloud-feedback-decomposed.pngZelinka 2017 fig 2 cloud feedback decomposedFrom Zelinka et al 2017https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/zelinka-2017-cloud-radiative-feedback-by-geography-fig-1.pngZelinka 2017 cloud radiative feedback by geography fig 1From Zelinka et al 20172025-10-24T05:09:06+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2017/11/26/models-on-and-off-the-catwalk-part-seven-resolution-convection/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/hohenegger-stevens-2016-fig-1-convective-self-aggregation-by-time.pngHohenegger & Stevens 2016 fig 1 convective self-aggregation by timeFrom Hohenegger & Stevens 2016https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/muller-held-2012-fig-6-domain-size-and-dx.pngMuller & Held 2012 fig 6 domain size and dxFrom Muller & Held 2012https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/muller-hald-2012-fig-2.pngMuller & Hald 2012 fig 2From Muller & Held 2012https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/muller-held-2012-fig-1-convective-aggregation.pngMuller & Held 2012 fig 1 convective aggregationFrom Muller & Held 20122018-09-17T08:06:36+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2017/11/23/cimate-sensitivity-stevens-et-al-2016/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/stevens-2016-ecs-stories.pngStevens 2016 ECS storiesFrom Stevens et al 20162019-05-31T22:58:55+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2015/12/17/renewables-xvi-jp-morgan-advises/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/jpmorgan-nuclear-vs-renewables.pngJPMorgan-nuclear-vs-renewablesFrom JP Morgan 2015https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/jpmorgan-germany-california-cost-vs-emissions.pngJPMorgan Germany-California-cost-vs-emissionsFrom JP Morgan 2015https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/jpmorgan-future-costs.pngJPMorgan future costsFrom JP Morgan 20152017-11-20T22:42:41+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2017/11/20/models-on-and-off-the-catwalk-part-six-tuning-and-seasonal-contrasts/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/nigam-2017-seasonal-long-term-trends-model-vs-obs-nh-fig-2.pngNigam-2017-Seasonal-long-term-trends-model-vs-obs-NH-fig-2From Nigam et al 2017https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/nigam-2017-seasonal-long-term-trends-temperature-nh-fig-1.pngNigam-2017-Seasonal-long-term-trends-temperature-NH-fig-1From Nigam et al 20172017-11-25T21:10:54+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2017/11/17/renewables-xx-recent-renewable-statistics/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/renewable-progress-2006-20161.pngRenewable progress 2006-2016From BP datahttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/renewable-progress-2006-2016.pngRenewable progress - 2006-2016Figures from BP2020-04-01T05:05:21+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2017/11/05/water-vapour-feedback-is-simply-written-into-climate-models-as-parameters/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/cam4-extract.pngCAM4 extractFrom CAM4 Technical Note2020-05-12T21:03:20+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2017/11/05/two-basic-foundations/2018-01-17T10:36:29+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2017/09/24/impacts-xiv-tropical-cyclones-and-climate-change-1/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/bender-2010-fig-s3.pngBender-2010-fig-S3From Bender et al 2010https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/bender-2010-fig-1.pngBender-2010-fig-1From Bender et al 2010https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/knutson-2007-hurricane-frequency.pngKnutson 2007 Hurricane FrequencyFrom Knutson et al 2007https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/knutson-et-al-2007.pngKnutson et al 2007From Knutson et al 2007https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/vecchi-2008-tc-correlations-to-sst.pngVecchi-2008-TC-correlations-to-SSTFrom Vecchi et al 20082017-10-25T20:44:07+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2017/08/21/impacts-xiii-rainfall-3/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/allen-ingram-2002-fig2.pngAllen-Ingram-2002-fig2From Allen & Ingram 2002https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/allen-ingram-2002-fig3.pngAllen-Ingram-2002-fig3From Allen & Ingram (2002) 2017-11-01T17:10:14+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2017/08/01/the-debate-is-over-99-of-scientists-believe-gravity-and-the-heliocentric-solar-system-so-therefore/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/ray-crop-yields-2013.pngRay-Crop yields-2013From Ray et al 20132019-05-25T20:41:19+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2015/07/30/renewable-energy-i/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/godfrey-p19.pngGodfrey-p19https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/screen-shot-2015-07-04-at-6-54-35-pm.pngScreen Shot 2015-07-04 at 6.54.35 pm2019-09-28T07:12:17+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2015/08/03/renewables-ii-solar-and-free-lunches/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/screen-shot-2015-08-02-at-6-14-11-pm.pngScreen Shot 2015-08-02 at 6.14.11 pmhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/screen-shot-2015-08-02-at-6-10-33-pm.pngScreen Shot 2015-08-02 at 6.10.33 pmhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/lu-wang-2010-solar-panel-details.pngLu & Wang 2010 - Solar panel detailshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/lu-yang-2010-pie-chart-of-energy-in-solar-production.pngLu & Yang 2010- Pie chart of energy in solar productionFrom Lu & Yang (2010)2017-07-26T06:14:56+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2015/08/07/renewables-iii-us-grid-operators-opinions/2017-07-26T06:14:14+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2015/08/10/renewables-iv-wind-forecast-horizon-backups/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/boyle-2010-wind-power-single-vs-distributed.pngBoyle 2010 Wind power single vs distributedhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/boyle-2010-wind-output-from-e-on-netz1.pngBoyle 2010 Wind output from E.ON Netzhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/boyle-2010-denmark-hourly-change-single-vs-all.pngBoyle 2010 Denmark hourly change single vs allhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/boyle-2010-pd-of-wind-power-in-uk.pngBoyle 2010 PD of wind power in UKhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/boyle-2010-wind-output-from-e-on-netz.pngBoyle 2010 Wind output from E.ON NetzFrom Boyle 2010https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/wind-fluctuations-vs-time-horizon.pngWind fluctuations vs time horizonFrom Gross et al 2006https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/gross-2006-fig2-1-uk-demand.pngGross-2006-Fig2.1-UK-DemandFrom Gross et al 20062017-07-26T06:12:49+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2015/08/22/renewables-v-grid-stability-as-wind-power-penetration-increases/2017-07-26T06:11:55+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2015/08/28/renewables-vi-report-says-100-renewables-by-2030-or-2050/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/aemo-fig20-winter-demand-matching.pngAEMO-fig20-winter-demand-matchinghttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/aemo-fig14.pngAEMO-fig14https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/aemo-generationmix-fig91.pngAEMO-GenerationMix-fig9https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/aemo-capitalcosts-table4.pngAEMO-Capitalcosts-table4https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/aemo-generationmix-fig8.pngAEMO-GenerationMix-fig8https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/aemo-costs-table5.pngAEMO-Costs-table5https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/aemo-fig4-new-transmission.pngAEMO-fig4-new-transmissionhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/aemo-fig2-scenario1-with-demand-management.pngAEMO-fig2-scenario1-with-demand-management2017-07-26T06:10:16+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2015/08/30/renewables-vii-feasibility-and-reality-geothermal-example/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/geodynamics.pngGeodynamics2018-04-02T14:14:17+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2015/09/01/renewables-viii-transmission-costs-and-outsourcing-renewable-generation/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/aemo-transmissioncosts-tablee1.pngAEMO-TransmissionCosts-TableE1https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/parallel_500kv_lines.jpgparallel_500kV_lineshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/hamilton_beach_pylon.jpgHamilton_Beach_Pylonhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/electric-power-systems-thyristor-bank.pngElectric-Power-Systems-Thyristor-Bankhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/electric-power-systems-dc2.pngElectric Power Systems -dc2https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/electric-power-systems-dc1.pngElectric Power Systems -dc12017-07-26T06:08:26+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2015/09/07/renewables-ix-onshore-wind-costs/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/nrel-lcoe-sensitivity.pngNREL-LCOE-Sensitivityhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/nrel-2011-wind-capex-opex.pngNREL-2011-Wind-Capex-Opexhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/blanco-2009-data-sources-for-om.pngBlanco-2009-Data sources for O&Mhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/blanco-2009-data-sources-for-capex.pngBlanco-2009-Data sources for Capexhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/ewea-2009-capex-breakdown.pngEWEA-2009-Capex-breakdownhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/blanco-2009-windpower-breakdown.pngBlanco-2009-Windpower breakdownFrom Blanco 20092019-04-07T23:36:41+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2015/09/09/renewables-x-nationalism-vs-inter-nationalism/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/osmani-2013-wind-resources.pngOsmani 2013 Wind ResourcesFrom Osmani 2012017-07-26T06:06:49+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2015/09/13/renewables-xi-cost-of-gas-plants-vs-wind-farms/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/capex-cost-at-41-cap-factor.pngCapex cost at 41% cap factorhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/capex-cost.pngCapex costhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/eia-henryhub-gas-price.pngEIA-HenryHub Gas PriceSource: IEA Henry Hub Priceshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/iea-2015-gas-prices.pngIEA 2015 - Gas pricesFrom IEA 2015https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/kehlhofer-2009-net-efficiency-conventional.pngKehlhofer-2009-Net efficiency conventionalhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/kehlhofer-2009-lcoe-with-inputs.pngKehlhofer-2009-LCOE with inputshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/kehlhofer-2009-fixed-om.pngKehlhofer-2009-Fixed-O&Mhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/kehlhofer-2009-conventional-om-costs.pngKehlhofer-2009-Conventional O&M costshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/kehlhofer-2009-conventional-construction-times.pngKehlhofer-2009-Conventional Construction Timeshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/kehlhofer-2009-capex-costs-conventional-plants.pngKehlhofer-2009-Capex Costs Conventional Plants2017-07-26T06:06:10+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2015/09/19/renewables-xii-windpower-as-baseload-and-supergrids/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/archer-2007-fig-3.pngArcher 2007 fig 3From Archer & Jacobson 2007https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/archer-2007-fig-2.pngArcher 2007 fig 2From Archer & Jacobson 2007https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/czisch-ernst-2001-fig-5.pngCzisch & Ernst 2001-fig 5From Czisch & Ernst 2001https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/czisch-ernst-2001-fig4.pngCzisch & Ernst 2001-fig4From Czisch & Ernst 2001https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/czisch-ernst-2001-fig-3.pngCzisch & Ernst 2001 fig 3From Czisch & Ernst 2001https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/czisch-ernst-2001-fig-2.pngCzisch & Ernst 2001 fig 2From Czisch & Ernst 2001https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/czisch-2001-fig-1.pngCzisch 2001 Fig 1From Czisch & Ernst 20012017-07-26T06:04:31+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2015/10/07/renewables-xiii-one-of-winds-hidden-costs/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/albadi-el-saadany-balancing-costs-of-wind-2010.pngAlbadi & El-Saadany Balancing costs of wind 2010From Albadi & El-Saadany 20102017-07-26T06:03:16+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2015/10/20/renewables-xiv-minimized-cost-of-99-9-renewable-study/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/budischak-2013-fig-5.pngBudischak 2013 fig 5From Budischak et al 2013https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/budischak-2013-fig-4.pngBudischak 2013 fig 4From Budischak et al 2013https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/budischak-2013-fig-3.pngBudischak 2013 fig 3From Budischak et al 2013https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/budischak-2013-table-3.pngBudischak 2013 table 3From Budischak et al 2013https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/budischak-2013-table-2.pngBudischak 2013 table 2https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/budischak-2013-table-1.pngBudischak 2013 table 1https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/budischak-2013-fig-1.pngBudischak 2013 fig 1From Budischak et al 20132022-07-12T21:56:38+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2015/11/18/renewables-xv-offshore-wind-costs/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/ukerc-wind-cost-capex-actuals.pngUKERC-Wind cost capex actualsFrom UKERChttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/ukerc-projected-wind-costs-2003-2009.pngUKERC-Projected wind costs 2003-2009From UKERC 2013https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/irena-2012-wind-power-cost-trends.pngIRENA 2012 - wind power cost trendsFrom IRENA 20122018-11-20T01:40:47+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2017/01/31/renewables-xviii-demand-management-levelized-cost/2017-07-26T05:59:15+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2015/12/19/renewables-xvii-demand-management-1/2017-07-26T05:57:11+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/roadmap/renewable-energy/2017-07-26T05:52:55+00:00weekly0.6https://scienceofdoom.com/2017/07/26/renewables-xix-behind-the-executive-summary-and-reality-vs-dreams/2019-09-05T19:37:07+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2017/06/25/the-confirmation-bias-a-feature-not-a-bug/2018-07-25T07:36:46+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2017/05/18/impacts-xii-rainfall-2/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/lau-2013-rainfall-fig4.pngLau-2013-Rainfall-fig4From Lau et al 2013https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/lau-2013-rainfall-fig3.pngLau-2013-Rainfall-fig3From Lau et al 2013https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/lau-2013-rainfall-tables2.pngLau-2013-Rainfall-tableS2From Lau et al 2013https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/lau-2013-rainfall-fig2.pngLau-2013-Rainfall-fig2From Lau et al 2013https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/lau-2013-rainfall-figs2.pngLau-2013-Rainfall-FigS2From Lau et al 2013https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/lau-2013-rainfall-figs1.pngLau-2013-Rainfall-figS1From Lau et al 2013https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/lau-2013-figs3-rainfall-changes-by-region.pngLau-2013-figS3-rainfall changes by regionFrom Lau et al 2013https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/lau-2014-rainfall-fig1.pngLau-2013-Rainfall-fig1From Lau et al 20132017-05-25T16:14:59+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2017/05/08/impacts-xi-rainfall-1/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/ipcc-ch9-models-precipitation.pngIPCC-Ch9-Models-PrecipitationFrom IPCC AR5 ch 9https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/becker-2013-raingauge-coverage.pngBecker-2013-Raingauge-coverageFrom Becker et al 2013https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/becker-2013-precipication-gpcc-stations1.pngBecker-2013-Precipication-GPCC-stationsFrom Becker et al 2013https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/becker-2013-precipication-gpcc-stations.pngBecker-2013-Precipication-GPCC-stationsFrom Becker et al 2013https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/adler-2003-fig-5-precipitation-by-latitude.pngAdler 2003 fig 5 precipitation by latitudeFrom Adler et al 2003https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/adler-2003-fig-4-annual-mean-precipitation-global.pngAdler 2003 fig 4 annual mean precipitation globalFrom Adler et al 2003https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/ipcc-ar5-ch2-graphs-by-region.pngIPCC-AR5-ch2-graphs-by-regionFrom IPCC AR5 ch 2https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/rainfall-ipcc-ar5-ch2-table2-10.pngRainfall-IPCC-AR5-ch2-table2.10From IPCC AR5 Ch. 2https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/rainfall-ipcc-ar5-ch2-table2-9.pngRainfall-IPCC-AR5-ch2-table2.9From IPCC AR5 Ch. 22017-07-09T12:53:49+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2017/05/04/impacts-x-sea-level-rise-5-bangladesh/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/bangladesh-population-density-and-lecz.jpgbangladesh-population-density-and-leczhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/worldbank-bangladesh-floods.pngWorldBank-Bangladesh-floodsFrom World Bank 2011https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/karim-2008-bangladesh-storms.pngKarim 2008 Bangladesh stormsFrom Karim and Mimura 20082017-05-08T13:07:51+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2017/05/02/impacts-ix-sea-level-4-sinking-megacities/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/nicholls-2011-subsidence.pngNicholls 2011-SubsidenceFrom Nicholls 20112017-05-06T05:33:20+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2017/02/21/models-on-and-off-the-catwalk-part-five-more-on-tuning-the-magic-behind-the-scenes/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/seifert-et-al-2015-large-eddy-simulation-fig1.pngseifert-et-al-2015-large-eddy-simulation-fig1From Seifert et al 2015https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/golaz-2013-cloud-condensation-fig3.pnggolaz-2013-cloud-condensation-fig3From Golaz et al 20132022-12-06T19:07:54+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2017/02/19/impacts-viii-sea-level-3-usa/2017-05-24T21:59:25+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2017/02/17/impacts-vii-sea-level-2-uncertainty/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/screen-shot-2017-02-14-at-11-49-16-pm-copy.pngscreen-shot-2017-02-14-at-11-49-16-pm-copyDonaeld the Unreadyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/tamisiea-rsl-from-greenland-antarctica-2011.pngtamisiea-rsl-from-greenland-antarctica-2011From Tamisiea 2011https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/tamisiea-rsl-from-greenland-antarctica-2011-499px.pngtamisiea-rsl-from-greenland-antarctica-2011-499pxFrom Tamisiea 20112017-07-21T16:20:28+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2017/02/16/impacts-vi-sea-level-rise-1/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/ar5-sea-level-rise-trends-last-100yrs-fig3-14.pngar5-sea-level-rise-trends-last-100yrs-fig3-14From AR5, chapter 3https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/ar5-sea-level-rise-fig3-13.pngar5-sea-level-rise-fig3-13From AR5, chapter 3https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/ar5-sea-level-rise-fig3-13-499px.pngar5-sea-level-rise-fig3-13-499pxFrom AR5, chapter 32017-05-18T02:48:20+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2017/02/12/impacts-v-climate-change-is-already-causing-worsening-storms-floods-and-droughts/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/orlowsky-droughts-2013-fig3.pngorlowsky-droughts-2013-fig3https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/orlowsky-droughts-2013-fig3-499px.pngorlowsky-droughts-2013-fig3-499pxFrom Orlowsky & Seneviratne 2013https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/ar5-trends-in-hurricanes-fig2-34.pngar5-trends-in-hurricanes-fig2-34From AR5, wg Ihttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/sheffield-global-trends-and-variability-in-soil-moisture-and-drought-characteristics-1950e280932000-fig7.pngsheffield-global-trends-and-variability-in-soil-moisture-and-drought-characteristics-1950-2000-fig7From Sheffield & Wood 2008https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/sheffield-global-trends-and-variability-in-soil-moisture-and-drought-characteristics-1950e280932000-fig7-499px.pngsheffield-global-trends-and-variability-in-soil-moisture-and-drought-characteristics-1950-2000-fig7-499pxFrom Sheffield & Wood 20082017-09-24T07:37:09+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2017/02/07/impacts-iv-temperature-projections-and-probabilities/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/ar5-ch12-table12-2-temperature-anomaly-2100.pngar5-ch12-table12-2-temperature-anomaly-2100https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/ar5-ch12-table12-2-temperature-anomaly-2100-499px.pngar5-ch12-table12-2-temperature-anomaly-2100-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/ar5-temperature-projections-fig12-5.pngar5-temperature-projections-fig12-5From AR5, chapter 122017-05-19T14:13:25+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/roadmap/confusion-over-the-basics/2019-12-06T05:17:55+00:00weekly0.6https://scienceofdoom.com/roadmap/atmospheric-radiation-and-the-greenhouse-effect/2019-08-19T14:38:50+00:00weekly0.6https://scienceofdoom.com/2017/02/06/impacts-iii-population-in-2100/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/lutz-population-growth-to-2100-2001.pnglutz-population-growth-to-2100-2001https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/lutz-population-growth-to-2100-2001-499px.pnglutz-population-growth-to-2100-2001-499pxFrom Lutz 20012017-02-16T00:12:00+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2017/02/05/impacts-ii-ghg-emissions-projections-sres-and-rcp/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/rcp-population-and-gdp-fig2.pngrcp-population-and-gdp-fig2https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/rcp-population-and-gdp-fig2-499px.pngrcp-population-and-gdp-fig2-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/rcp-fig10-rf.pngrcp-fig10-rfhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/rcp-fig10-rf-499px.pngrcp-fig10-rf-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/rcp-fig3-ghg-concentrations.pngrcp-fig3-ghg-concentrationshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/rcp-fig3-ghg-concentrations-499px.pngrcp-fig3-ghg-concentrations-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/rcp-fig6-ghg-emissions.pngrcp-fig6-ghg-emissionshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/rcp-fig6-ghg-emissions-499px.pngrcp-fig6-ghg-emissions-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/rcp-fig3-energy-consumption.pngrcp-fig3-energy-consumptionhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/rcp-fig3-energy-consumption-499px.pngrcp-fig3-energy-consumption-499px2017-02-09T18:54:34+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2017/02/02/impacts-i-introduction/2017-02-16T03:06:41+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2017/02/01/basics-emissivity-and-the-stefan-boltzmann-equation/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/emissivity-5800k.pngemissivity-5800khttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/emissivity-500k.pngemissivity-500khttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/emissivity-400k.pngemissivity-400khttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/emissivity-300k.pngemissivity-300khttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/emissivity-288k.pngemissivity-288k2021-06-09T22:23:02+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2016/01/26/ghosts-of-climates-past-twenty-note-on-emics/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/petoukhov-2000-climber-2-grid.pngPetoukhov 2000- Climber 2 gridFrom Petoukhov et al (2000)2016-11-22T16:23:52+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2012/12/23/clouds-water-vapor-part-five-back-of-the-envelope-calcs-from-pierrehumbert/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/pierrehumbert-1995-fig8.pngPierrehumbert-1995-fig8From Pierrehumbert 1995https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/pierrehumbert-1995-fig10.pngPierrehumbert-1995-fig10From Pierrehumbert 1995https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/pierrehumbert-1995-fig9.pngPierrehumbert-1995-fig9From Pierrehumbert 1995https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/convection-subsidence-minschwaner-mcelroy-1992.pngConvection-subsidence-Minschwaner-McElroy-1992From Minschwaner & McElroy 1992https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/potential-temperature-vs-pressure-vs-latitude-mp2008-499px.pngPotential-temperature-vs-pressure-vs-latitude-MP2008-499pxFrom Marshall & Plumb (2008)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/olr-for-different-humidities-surface-temps-pierrehumbert-1995.pngOLR-for-different-humidities-surface-temps-Pierrehumbert-1995From Pierrehumbert 1995https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/convection-subsidence-pierrehumbert-1995.pngConvection-subsidence-Pierrehumbert-1995From Pierrehumbert 1995https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/freq-rh-below-10-2-roca-2012.pngFreq-RH below 10%-2-Roca-2012From Roca et al 2012https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/freq-rh-below-10-roca-2012.pngFreq-RH below 10%-Roca-2012From Roca et al 20122020-02-08T00:40:42+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2012/12/29/clouds-water-vapor-part-six-nonlinearity-and-dry-atmospheres/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/roca-2012-tropical-vs-extratropical-origin-dry-air.pngRoca-2012-tropical-vs-extratropical-origin-dry-airFrom Roca et al 2012https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/roca-2012-brightness-temp-vs-wavelength.pngRoca-2012-brightness-temp-vs-wavelengthhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/ryoo-2008.pngRyoo-2008https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/roca-2012-fig4.pngRoca-2012-fig4https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/roca-2012.pngRoca-20122015-08-14T06:48:15+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2013/02/12/clouds-water-vapor-part-seven-upper-tropospheric-models-measurement/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/gettelman-fu-2007-fig3.pngGettelman-Fu-2007-Fig3From Gettelman & Fu (2008)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/manabe-wetherald-1967-2.pngManabe-Wetherald-1967-2https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/manabe-wetherald-1967.pngManabe-Wetherald-1967https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/gettelman-2008-rh-q-vs-ts.pngGettelman-2008-RH-q-vs-TsFrom Gettelman & Fu (2008)2015-08-14T06:47:35+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2015/04/30/clouds-water-vapor-part-eight-clear-sky-comparison-of-models-with-erbe-and-ceres/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/chung-2010-fig3.pngChung-2010-fig3From Chung et al (2010)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/chung-2010-fig2.pngChung-2010-fig2From Chung et al (2010)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/chung-2010-fig1b.pngChung-2010-fig1bFrom Chung et al (2010)2025-11-26T03:26:28+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2015/06/09/clouds-water-vapor-part-nine-data-i-ts-vs-olr/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/olr-from-ceres-vs-ts-from-ncar-as-timeseries.pngOLR from CERES vs Ts from NCAR as timeserieshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/ceres-monthly-discrepancy-by-month.pngCERES-Monthly-discrepancy-by-monthhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/ceres-monthly-discrepance-scatter-plot.pngCERES-Monthly-discrepance-scatter-plothttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/olr-vs-ts-ncar-ceres.pngOLR vs Ts - NCAR -CERES2024-04-01T15:36:21+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2015/07/12/clouds-water-vapor-part-ten-data-ii-ts-vs-olr/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/days-temperature-goes-in-same-direction.pngDays temperature goes in same directionhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/olr-vs-ts-ncar-ceres-monthlymeansremoved-noboundary.pngOLR vs Ts - NCAR -CERES-monthlymeansremoved-noboundaryhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/olr-vs-ts-ncar-ceres-dailymeansremoved.pngOLR vs Ts - NCAR -CERES-dailymeansremovedhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/olr-vs-ts-ncar-ceres-monthlymeansremoved.pngOLR vs Ts - NCAR -CERES-monthlymeansremovedhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/monthly-mean-daily-mean-for-ts-olr.pngMonthly mean & daily mean for Ts & OLR2015-08-14T06:43:24+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/roadmap/clouds-and-water-vapor/2020-08-27T19:34:51+00:00weekly0.6https://scienceofdoom.com/roadmap/2016-01-06T14:21:02+00:00weekly0.6https://scienceofdoom.com/roadmap/natural-variability-and-chaos/2015-08-14T06:36:30+00:00weekly0.6https://scienceofdoom.com/2014/12/30/natural-variability-and-chaos-seven-attribution-fingerprints-or-shadows/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/ipcc-ar5-chapter-10-fig-9-33.pngIPCC AR5 Chapter 10 fig 9.33From IPCC AR5 Chapter 10https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/jones-et-al-2013-fig-s11.pngJones et al 2013-Fig S11From Jones et al 2013, figure S11https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/knutson-et-al-2013-fig-1.pngKnutson et al 2013 fig 1From Knutson et al 2013https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/van-oldenborgh-2013-fig3.pngvan Oldenborgh-2013-fig3https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/van-oldenborgh-2013-fig1a.pngvan Oldenborgh 2013 fig1afrom van Oldenborgh et al 20132015-08-14T06:33:28+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2014/12/26/natural-variability-and-chaos-six-el-nino/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/wittenberg-2009-fig1.pngWittenberg-2009-fig1From Wittenberg 2009https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/wittenberg-2009-fig2.pngWittenberg 2009-fig2From Wittenberg 20092015-08-14T06:32:23+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2014/12/19/natural-variability-and-chaos-five-why-should-observations-match-models/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/rowlands-2012-fig1.pngRowlands 2012-fig1Rowlands et al 20122015-08-14T06:31:44+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2014/11/29/natural-variability-and-chaos-four-the-thirty-year-myth/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/suggested-replacement-for-ar5-box11-1-fig2.pngSuggested-replacement-for-AR5-box11.1-fig2Suggested replacement for AR5, Box 11.1, Figure 2https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/ar5-box11-1-fig2.pngAR5 Box11.1 Fig2From IPCC AR5 Chapter 112020-06-12T21:36:26+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2014/11/01/natural-variability-and-chaos-three-attribution-fingerprints/2015-08-14T06:29:52+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2014/07/27/natural-variability-and-chaos-two-lorenz-1963/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/lorenz63-first-50s-x-y-z-3-different-conditions.pngLorenz63-first-50s-x-y-z-3-different-conditionshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/lorenz63-first-50s-x-y-z-3-different-conditions-499px.pngLorenz63-first-50s-x-y-z-3-different-conditions-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/lorenz-25000s-histogram-of-means-2-conditions.pngLorenz-25000s-histogram-of-means-2-conditionshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/lorenz-25000s-delta-histogram.pngLorenz-25000s-delta-histogramhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/lorenz63-25ksecs-x-time-1000s-average.pngLorenz63-25ksecs-x-time-1000s-averagehttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/lorenz63-25ksecs-x-time-1000s-average-499px.pngLorenz63-25ksecs-x-time-1000s-average-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/lorenz63-first-50s-x-y-z.pngLorenz63-first-50s-x-y-zhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/lorenz63-first-50s-x-y-z-499px.pngLorenz63-first-50s-x-y-z-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/lorenz63-5ksecs-x-y-vs-time-average.pngLorenz63-5ksecs-x-y-vs-time-averagehttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/lorenz63-5ksecs-x-y-vs-time-average-499px.pngLorenz63-5ksecs-x-y-vs-time-average-499px2020-10-01T02:21:50+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2014/07/22/natural-variability-and-chaos-one-introduction/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/pendulum-0-7-100k-seconds-2-conditions-hist.pngPendulum-0.7-100k seconds-2 conditions-histhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/pendulum-0-7-10k-seconds-2-conditions-hist.pngPendulum-0.7-10k seconds-2 conditions-histHistograms for 10k secondshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/pendulum-0-7-10k-seconds-2-conditions.pngPendulum-0.7-10k seconds-2 conditionsForced damped harmonic pendulum, b=0.7: Start angular speed 0.1; 0.1001https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/pendulum-forced-equation.pngPendulum-forced-equationhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/pendulum-forced.pngPendulum-forced2015-08-14T06:28:10+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2015/01/04/natural-variability-and-chaos-eight-abrupt-change/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/drijfhout-2013-fig-2.pngDrijfhout 2013-fig 2From Drijfhout et al 2013https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/drijfhout-2013-fig-1.pngDrijfhout 2013-fig 1From Drijfhout et al 20132015-08-14T06:26:17+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2015/07/20/clouds-water-vapor-part-ten-data-iii-annual-ts-vs-olr/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/global-annual-ts-vs-year-olr-vs-year-2001-2013.pngGlobal annual Ts vs year & OLR vs year 2001-2013https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/global-annual-ts-vs-olr-2001-2013.pngGlobal annual Ts vs OLR 2001-20132025-11-26T02:32:14+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2009/11/28/co2-an-insignificant-trace-gas-part-one/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/co2-h2o-absorption-spectra-hitrans1.pngCO2-H2O-absorption-spectra-HITRANSFrom the HITRANS 2008 database, via spectralcalc.comhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/absorption-spectra-co2-h2o-climate_near_the_ground-geiger-2003-499px.pngAbsorption-spectra-CO2-H2O-Climate_near_the_Ground-Geiger-2003-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/absorption-spectra-co2-h2o-climate_near_the_ground-geiger-2003.pngAbsorption-spectra-CO2-H2O-Climate_near_the_Ground-Geiger-2003https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/olr-toa-goody-1989.pngOLR-TOA-Goody-1989Measured and theoretical spectra, from Goody & Yung (1989)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/olr-toa-goody-1989-499px.pngOLR-TOA-Goody-1989-499pxMeasured and theoretical spectra, from Goody & Yung (1989)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/solar-toa-and-earth-surface-taylor-2007.pngSolar-TOA-and-earth-surface-Taylor-2007From Vardavas & Taylor (2007)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/radiation-sun-earth-linacre-with-gas-absorption-nocaption1.pngRadiation-sun-earth-Linacre-with-gas-absorption-nocaptionSun & earth radiation showing different gas absorptionhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/radiation-sun-earth-linacre-with-gas-absorption-nocaption.pngRadiation-sun-earth-Linacre-with-gas-absorption-nocaptionSun & earth radiation showing different gas absorptionhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/blackbody_curve-sun-earth.jpgRadiation vs Wavelength from sun and earthRadiation vs Wavelength - Sun and Earthhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/radiation-earth-bigg-with-gas-absorption-nocaption.pngRadiation-earth-Bigg-with-gas-absorption-nocaptionRadiation spectra from the earth showing absorption from atmospheric gases2024-02-16T01:37:07+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/04/18/stratospheric-cooling/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/stratospheric-trends-plus-models-alleffects-2003-shine.pngStratospheric-trends-plus-models-alleffects-2003-ShineStratospheric observations and models for ozone, GHG and water vapor changes, Shine (2003)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/stratospheric-trends-plus-models-watervapor-2003-shine.pngStratospheric-trends-plus-models-watervapor-2003-ShineStratospheric observations and models for water vapor, Shine (2003)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/stratospheric-trends-plus-models-ghg-2003-shine.pngStratospheric-trends-plus-models-ghg-2003-ShineStratospheric observations and models for "greenhouse" gas changes, Shine (2003)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/stratospheric-cooling-97-07-randel-20081.pngStratospheric-cooling-97-07-Randel-2008Stratospheric temperature trends by pressure, 1979-2007, Randel (2008)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/stratospheric-cooling-97-07-randel-2008.pngStratospheric-cooling-79-07-Randel-2008Stratospheric temperature trends by pressure, 1979-2007, Randel (2008) https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/stratospheric-temp-trends-1979-2003-thompson-2005.pngStratospheric-temp-trends-1979-2003-Thompson-2005Stratospheric Temperature Trends 1979-2003, Thompson (2005)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/stratospheric-trends-plus-models-2003-shine.pngStratospheric-trends-plus-models-2003-ShineStratospheric observations and models, Shine (2003)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/solar-absorption-stratosphere-taylor.pngSolar-absorption-stratosphere-TaylorAbsorption effects of different "amounts" of the atmosphere, Taylor (2005)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/pressure-and-height-vs-temp-bigg-2005.pngPressure-and-Height-vs-Temp-Bigg-2005Atmospheric Pressure and Temperature, Bigg (2005)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/stratospheric-cooling-co2-caption-manabe-1967.pngStratospheric-cooling-CO2-caption-Manabe-1967Stratospheric cooling from increasing CO22024-05-23T14:29:53+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2015/05/09/geese-gold-bunnies-and-the-first-law-of-thermodynamics/2015-06-09T04:47:56+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2015/02/04/the-holocaust-climate-science-and-proof/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/screen-shot-2015-02-03-at-8-03-13-pm.pngScreen Shot 2015-02-03 at 8.03.13 pmhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/screen-shot-2015-02-03-at-7-54-49-pm.pngScreen Shot 2015-02-03 at 7.54.49 pmhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/screen-shot-2015-02-03-at-7-40-31-pm.pngScreen Shot 2015-02-03 at 7.40.31 pmhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/screen-shot-2015-02-03-at-7-31-24-pm.pngScreen Shot 2015-02-03 at 7.31.24 pmhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/screen-shot-2015-02-03-at-7-18-53-pm.pngScreen Shot 2015-02-03 at 7.18.53 pm2015-08-07T09:39:51+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2014/08/23/turbulence-closure-and-parameterization/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/surface-wind-profile1.pngSurface-wind-profilehttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/durbin-et-al-kolmogoroff.pngDurbin-et-al-KolmogoroffFrom Durbin & Reif 2010https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/turbulence-nasa.pngTurbulence-nasaFrom NASA - http://www.nas.nasa.gov/SC12/demos/demo28.html2016-09-20T17:08:08+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2014/08/15/latent-heat-and-parameterization/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/zhang-humidity-2014-fig9.pngZhang-humidity-2014-fig9From Zhang & Liu 2014https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/zhang-humidity-2014-fig6.pngZhang-humidity-2014-fig6From Zhang & Liu 2014https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/zhang-humidity-2014-fig5.pngZhang-humidity-2014-fig5From Zhang & Liu 2014https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/zhang-humidity-2014-fig3.pngZhang-humidity-2014-fig3From Zhang & Liu 2014https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/zhang-humidity-2014-fig2.pngZhang-humidity-2014-fig2From Zhang & Liu 2014https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/zhang-2014-instruments.pngZhang 2014-instrumentshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/stull-turbulent-wind.pngStull-Turbulent-windFrom Stull 19882015-01-11T21:26:04+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2014/08/12/the-atmosphere-cools-to-space-by-co2-and-water-vapor-so-more-ghgs-more-cooling/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/cooling-to-space-3a1.pngCooling-to-space-3ahttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/cooling-to-space-3a.pngCooling-to-space-3ahttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/cooling-to-space-2a.pngCooling-to-space-2a2016-05-10T21:33:36+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2014/08/11/a-challenge-for-bryan-the-solution/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/bryan-sphere.pngBryan-sphere2016-10-06T20:22:44+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2014/08/07/a-challenge-for-bryan/2018-11-02T20:54:10+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2014/07/20/does-the-surface-temperature-change-with-back-radiation-kramm-vs-gerlich/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/kramm-dlugi-2011-eqn-highlight2.pngKramm-Dlugi-2011-eqn-highlighthttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/kramm-dlugi-2011-eqn-highlight1.pngKramm-Dlugi-2011-eqn-highlighthttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/fundamentals-of-heat-and-mass-transfer-post-gt2.pngFundamentals-of-heat-and-mass-transfer-post-G&Thttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/kramm-dlugi-2011-eqn-highlight.pngKramm-Dlugi-2011-eqn-highlighthttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/fundamentals-of-heat-and-mass-transfer-post-gt1.pngFundamentals-of-heat-and-mass-transfer-post-G&Thttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/fundamentals-of-heat-and-mass-transfer-pre-gt.pngFundamentals-of-heat-and-mass-transfer-pre-G&TFrom Incropera & DeWitt (2007)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/fundamentals-of-heat-and-mass-transfer-post-gt.pngFundamentals-of-heat-and-mass-transfer-post-G&Thttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/gerlich-2nd-law-2.pnggerlich-2nd-law-2From Gerlich & Tscheuschner2015-11-21T15:10:01+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2014/07/11/models-on-and-off-the-catwalk-part-four-tuning-the-magic-behind-the-scenes/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/mauritsen-2012-convection-parameters-2-499px.pngMauritsen-2012-Convection-parameters-2-499pxFrom Mauritsen et al 2012https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/mauritsen-2012-convection-parameters-2.pngMauritsen-2012-Convection-parameters-2From Mauritsen et al 2012https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/mauritsen-2012-convection-parameters.pngMauritsen-2012-Convection-parametersFrom Mauritsen et al 2012https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/mauritsen-2012-climate-model-drift.pngMauritsen-2012-Climate-model-driftFrom Mauritsen et al 2012https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/mauritsen-2012-ensembles-industrial-era.pngMauritsen-2012-Ensembles-industrial-eraFrom Mauritsen et al 20122015-01-13T23:45:01+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/roadmap/gcms/2014-07-11T05:51:02+00:00weekly0.6https://scienceofdoom.com/2014/06/15/on-uses-of-a-4-x-2-arrhenius-the-last-15-years-of-temperature-history-and-other-parodies/2014-07-10T21:01:52+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2014/07/08/ensemble-forecasting/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/ensemble-palmer-2005-multi-model.pngEnsemble-Palmer-2005-multi-modelFrom Palmer et al 2005https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/ensemble-palmer-2005-fig3.pngEnsemble-Palmer-2005-fig3https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/ensemble-palmer-2005-fig3-499px.pngEnsemble-Palmer-2005-fig3-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/ensemble-palmer-2005-lorenz-fig2.pngEnsemble-Palmer-2005-Lorenz-fig2https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/ensemble-velocity-spread-vs-mean.pngEnsemble-velocity-spread-vs-meanhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/ensemble-std-dev-v.pngEnsemble-std-dev-vhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/ensemble-velocity-mean.pngEnsemble-velocity-mean2014-07-13T22:25:48+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2014/06/26/the-greenhouse-effect-explained-in-simple-terms/2025-07-06T22:07:27+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2014/06/21/radiative-atmospheres-with-no-convection/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/temp-profile-no-convection-280-560ppm-co2-40-levels-50rh1.pngTemp-profile-no-convection-280-560ppm-CO2-40-levels-50%RHhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/temp-profile-no-convection-280-560ppm-co2-40-levels-50rh.pngTemp-profile-no-convection-280-560ppm-CO2-40-levels-50%RHhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/temp-profile-no-convection-doubled-ghgs-40-levels-50rh.pngTemp-profile-no-convection-doubled-GHGs-40-levels-50%RHhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/flux-noconvection-current-ghgs-40-levels-50rh.pngFlux-noconvection-current-GHGs-40-levels-50%RHhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/temp-profile-no-convection-current-ghgs-40-levels-50rh.pngTemp-profile-no-convection-current-GHGs-40-levels-50%RHhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/wv-conc-no-convection-current-ghgs-40-levels-50rh.pngwv-conc-no-convection-current-GHGs-40-levels-50%RHhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/radiative-no-convection-current-ghgs-40-levels-50rh.pngRadiative-no-convection-current-GHGs-40-levels-50%RHhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/lapserate-noconvection-current-ghgs-40-levels-50rh.pngLapseRate-noconvection-current-GHGs-40-levels-50%RH2014-07-05T23:38:38+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2014/04/14/ghosts-of-climates-past-nineteen-ice-sheet-models-i/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/abe-ouchi-eqn11.pngAbe-Ouchi-eqn11https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/abe-ouchi-2007-fig8.pngAbe-Ouchi-2007-fig8From Abe-Ouchi et al 2007https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/abe-ouchi-eqn7.pngAbe-Ouchi-eqn7https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/abe-ouchi-2007-eqn6.pngAbe-Ouchi-2007-eqn6https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/abe-ouchi-2007-fig4.pngAbe-Ouchi-2007-fig4From Abe-Ouchi et al 2007https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/abe-ouchi-2007-fig2.pngAbe-Ouchi-2007-fig2From Abe-Ouchi et al 2007https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/abe-ouchi-2007-fig1.pngAbe-Ouchi-2007-fig1From Abe-Ouchi et al 20072016-07-08T17:46:02+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2013/11/11/ghosts-of-climates-past-part-six-hypotheses-abound/2014-07-10T23:19:01+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2013/11/23/ghosts-of-climates-past-part-seven-gcm-i/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/rind-et-al-1989-1.pngRind et al 1989-12015-02-13T02:57:10+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2013/12/27/ghosts-of-climates-past-part-eight-gcm-ii/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/vettoretti-2003-fig1.pngVettoretti-2003-fig1From Vettoretti & Peltier 2003https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/vettoretti-2004-fig1-insolation-co2-d18o.pngVettoretti-2004-fig1-insolation-CO2-d18Ohttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/vettoretti-2004-fig1-insolation-co2-d18o-499px.pngVettoretti-2004-fig1-insolation-CO2-d18O-499pxVettoretti & Peltier 2004https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/yoshimori-2002-fig1-insolation-anomaly-116kabp1.pngYoshimori-2002-Fig1-insolation-anomaly-116kaBPhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/yoshimori-2002-fig1-insolation-anomaly-116kabp.pngYoshimori-2002-Fig1-insolation-anomaly-116kaBP2014-04-14T05:36:50+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2013/12/31/ghosts-of-climates-past-part-nine-gcm-iii/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/smith-2012-fig1.pngSmith-2012-fig1From Smith & Gregory 20122014-04-14T05:36:03+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2014/01/03/ghosts-of-climates-past-part-ten-gcm-iv/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/jochum-2012-table-1.pngJochum-2012-table-1https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/jochum-2012-fig2-toa-sw.pngJochum-2012-fig2-TOA-swJochum et al 20122014-04-14T05:35:26+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2014/01/07/ghosts-of-climates-past-pop-quiz-end-of-an-ice-age/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/ice-ages-part11-a-d.pngice-ages-part11-A-Dhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/ice-ages-part11-e-h.pngice-ages-part11-E-Hhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/ice-ages-part11-e-h-499px.pngice-ages-part11-E-H-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/ice-ages-part11-a-d-499px.pngice-ages-part11-A-D-499px2015-01-30T04:20:22+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2014/01/09/ghosts-of-climates-past-eleven-end-of-the-last-ice-age/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/wais-2013-fig1.pngWAIS-2013-fig1From WAIS Divide Project (2013)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/skakun-et-al-2012-fig4.pngSkakun-et-al-2012-fig4From Shakun et al 2012https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/toa-insolation-june21-65n-125k-present.pngTOA-insolation-June21-65N-125k-presenthttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/skakun-et-al-2012-fig5.pngSkakun-et-al-2012-fig5From Shakun et al 2012https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/skakun-et-al-2012-fig2-499px.pngSkakun-et-al-2012-fig2-499pxFrom Shakun et al 20122022-12-27T14:11:15+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2014/01/16/ghosts-of-climates-past-twelve-gcm-v-ice-age-termination/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/he-et-al-2013-fig1d.pngHe et al 2013 fig1dhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/ngrip-20k-10k-bp-499px.pngNGRIP-20k-10k-BP-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/he-et-al-2013-figs27.pngHe et al 2013-figS27https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/he-et-al-2013-figs25.pngHe et al 2013-figS25https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/he-et-al-2013-fig4.pngHe et al 2013-fig4https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/he-et-al-2013-fig4-annotated.pngHe et al 2013-fig4-annotatedhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/he-et-al-2013-fig4-annotated-499px.pngHe et al 2013-fig4-annotated-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/he-et-al-2013-fig1-annotated.pngHe et al 2013 fig1-annotatedFrom He et al 2013https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/he-et-al-2013-fig1.pngHe et al 2013 fig1From He et al 2013https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/toa-insolation-june21-60n-130k-present.pngTOA-insolation-June21-60N-130k-present2014-04-14T05:32:15+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2014/01/23/ghosts-of-climates-past-thirteen-terminator-ii/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/dml-on-edc3-150-100kyrs.pngDML-on-EDC3-150-100kyrsData from EPICAhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/toa-insolation-65n-jul1-last-180kyrs-label-t1-t2.pngTOA-insolation-65N-Jul1-last-180kyrs-label-T1-T2https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/toa-insolation-65n-jul1-last-180kyrs-label-t1-t2-499px.pngTOA-insolation-65N-Jul1-last-180kyrs-label-T1-T2-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/drysdale-2009-fig3.pngDrysdale-2009-fig3From Drysdale et al 2009https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/drysdale-2009-fig2.pngDrysdale-2009-fig2https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/drysdale-2009-fig2-499px.pngDrysdale-2009-fig2-499pxFrom Drysdale et al 2009https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/drysdale-2009-fig1.pngDrysdale-2009-fig1https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/drysdale-2009-fig1-499px.pngDrysdale-2009-fig1-499pxFrom Drysdale et al 2009https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/yuan-2004-fig2.pngYuan-2004-fig2https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/yuan-2004-fig2-499px.pngYuan-2004-fig2-499pxFrom Yuan et al 20042014-04-14T05:31:11+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2014/01/30/ghosts-of-climates-past-fourteen-concepts-hd-data/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/epica-2006-fig1.pngEPICA-2006-fig1https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/lr04-huybers-edc-obliquity-precession-last-500kyrs-499px.pngLR04-Huybers-EDC-Obliquity-Precession-last-500kyrs-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/edml-ngrip-co2-ch4-last-150kyrs-499px.pngEDML-NGRIP-CO2-CH4-last-150kyrs-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/edc-edml-ngrip-obliquity-prec-last-150kyrs-499px.pngEDC-EDML-NGRIP-Obliquity-Prec-last-150kyrs-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/parennin-2007-edc3-timescale-fig3-499px.pngParennin-2007-EDC3-timescale-fig3-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/obliquity-precession-annual-insolation-anomaly-last-500ka-499px.pngObliquity-Precession-Annual-insolation-anomaly-last-500ka-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/edc-and-huybers-proxy-co2-ch4-obliquity-last-500kyrs-499px.pngEDC-and-Huybers-Proxy-CO2-CH4-Obliquity-last-500kyrs-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/epica-2006-fig1-499px.pngEPICA-2006-fig1-499pxFrom EPICA 20062014-04-14T05:29:41+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2014/02/02/ghosts-of-climates-past-fifteen-roe-vs-huybers/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/roe-comparison-last-200kyrs.pngRoe-comparison-last-200kyrshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/roe-comparison-last-100kyrs.pngRoe-comparison-last-100kyrshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/roe-comparison-lag-correlation.pngRoe-comparison-lag-correlationhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/roe2006-fig2.pngRoe2006-fig2https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/roe2006-fig2-499px.pngRoe2006-fig2-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/roe-comparison.pngRoe-comparisonhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/roe-comparison-499px.pngRoe-comparison-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/dhuybers2007dt-vs-insolation-65n.pngdHuybers2007dt-vs-Insolation-65Nhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/dhuybers2007dt-vs-insolation-65n-499px.pngdHuybers2007dt-vs-Insolation-65N-499px2020-01-20T15:23:05+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2014/02/03/ghosts-of-climates-past-sixteen-roe-vs-huybers-ii/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/parennin-et-al-2007-agemarkers.pngParennin-et-al-2007-agemarkersFrom Parennin et al 2007https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/roe-comparison-last-270kyrs-remappedhuybers.pngRoe-comparison-last-270kyrs-remappedHuybershttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/roe-comparison-last-270kyrs-remappedhuybers-499px.pngRoe-comparison-last-270kyrs-remappedHuybers-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/huybers-icevolume-last-270kyrs-remapped.pngHuybers-icevolume-last-270kyrs-remapped2014-04-14T05:27:41+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2014/02/24/ghosts-of-climates-past-seventeen-proxies-under-water-i/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/hoefs-2009-fig3-15.pngHoefs-2009-fig3.15From Hoefs 2009https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/ferronsky-2012-fig3-2-dd-surface-concentration-on-ocean-a.pngFerronsky-2012-fig3.2-dD surface concentration on ocean-aFrom Ferronsky & Polyakov 2012https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/dansgaard-1964-fig3.pngDansgaard-1964-fig3From Dansgaard 1964https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/rinsberger-1990-fig34.pngRinsberger-1990-fig3&4From Rindsberger et al 1990https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/rinsberger-1990-fig2.pngRinsberger-1990-fig2From Rindsberger et al 1990https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/gat-fig-6-2.pngGat fig 6.2From Gat 2010https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/gat-fig-6-2-499px.pngGat fig 6.2-499pxFrom Gat 2010https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/ferronsky-2012-table3-4-d18o-concentration-in-deep-ocean-by-location.pngFerronsky-2012-table3.4-d18O concentration in deep ocean by locationhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/ferronsky-2012-fig3-2-dd-surface-concentration-on-ocean.pngFerronsky-2012-fig3.2-dD surface concentration on oceanFrom Ferronsky & Polyakov (2010)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/ferronsky-2012-fig3-1-dd-concentration-profile-in-ocean.pngFerronsky-2012-fig3.1-dD concentration profile in ocean2014-06-09T12:17:59+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2014/03/03/ghosts-of-climates-past-eighteen-probably-nonlinearity-of-unknown-origin/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/berger-1978-extract.pngBerger-1978-extractBerger 1978https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/wolff-2010-fig5-dust-d18o-2-hi-res-periods.pngWolff-2010-fig5-Dust-d18O-2-hi-res-periodsFrom Wolff et al 2010https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/wolff-2010-fig3-dust-d18o-10k-80k-bp.pngWolff-2010-fig3-Dust-d18O-10k-80k-BPFrom Wolff et al 20102020-09-19T18:28:26+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/roadmap/ghosts-of-climates-past/2014-04-14T05:19:36+00:00weekly0.6https://scienceofdoom.com/2011/04/03/understanding-atmospheric-radiation-and-the-%e2%80%9cgreenhouse%e2%80%9d-effect-%e2%80%93-part-ten/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/pressure-and-height-vs-temp-bigg-2005.pngPressure-and-Height-vs-Temp-Bigg-2005From Grant Bigg (2005)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/petty-3-upward-radiation-p225-6.pngPetty-3-upward-radiation-p225-6From Grant Petty (2006)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/petty-2-upward-and-downward-radiation-p223.pngPetty-2-upward-and-downward-radiation-p223From Grant Petty (2006)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/petty-1-downward-surface-radiation-p219.pngPetty-1-downward-surface-radiation-p219From Grant Petty (2006)2014-01-28T19:38:03+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/02/16/ghosts-of-climates-past/2023-06-08T03:05:37+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2013/10/06/ghosts-of-climates-past-part-two-lorenz/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/hansen-et-al-1998.pngHansen et al 1998https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/kagan-et-al-1994-1.pngKagan et al 1994-1https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/kagan-et-al-1994-2.pngKagan et al 1994-2https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/lorenz-1968-5.pnglorenz-1968-5https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/lorenz-1968-4.pnglorenz-1968-4https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/lorenz-1968-3.pnglorenz-1968-3https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/lorenz-1968-21.pnglorenz-1968-2https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/lorenz-1968-2.pnglorenz-1968-2https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/lorenz-1968-1.pnglorenz-1968-12020-07-20T01:02:13+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2013/10/13/ghosts-of-climates-past-part-three-hays-imbrie-shackleton/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/hays-et-al-1976-4.pngHays-et-al-1976-4From Hays et al (1976)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/hays-et-al-1976-2.pngHays-et-al-1976-2From Hays et al (1976)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/hays-et-al-1976-1.pngHays-et-al-1976-1Hays, Imbrie & Shackleton (1976)2020-01-20T21:39:43+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2013/11/26/ghosts-of-climates-past-part-seven-and-a-half-mindmap/2014-01-27T06:22:34+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2013/10/17/ghosts-of-climates-past-part-five-obliquity-precession-changes/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/toa-detrended-time-120k-150kyrs-65n-by-season.pngTOA-detrended-time-120k-150kyrs-65'N-by-seasonhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/toa-time-120k-150kyrs-65n-by-season.pngTOA-time-120k-150kyrs-65'N-by-seasonhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/toa-spectral-power-last500ky-by-season-65n.pngTOA-Spectral-power-last500ky-by-season-65Nhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/toa-time-120k-150kyrs-55n-by-day-and-annual.pngTOA-time-120k-150kyrs-55'N-by-day-and-annualhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/toa-time-500ky-55n-annual-variation.pngTOA-time-500ky-55N-annual-variationhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/toa-time-500ky-65n-annual-variation.pngTOA-time-500ky-65N-annual-variationhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/toa-time-120k-150kyrs-65n-by-day-and-annual.pngTOA-time-120k-150kyrs-65'N-by-day-and-annualhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/toa-time-55n-500kyr-by-quarter.pngTOA-time-55N-500kyr-by-quarterhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/toa-time-65n-500kyr-by-quarter.pngTOA-time-65N-500kyr-by-quarter2015-12-02T21:41:03+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2013/10/14/ghosts-of-climates-past-part-four-understanding-orbits-seasons-and-stuff/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/daily-change-toa-solar-vs-eccentricity-2.pngDaily-Change-TOA-Solar-vs-Eccentricity-2https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/toa-solar-65n-bymonth-vs0-250k-lb-499px.pngTOA-Solar-65N-bymonth-vs0-250k-lb-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/toa-solar-oct1-latitude-vs0-250k-499px.pngTOA-Solar-Oct1-Latitude-vs0-250k-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/toa-solar-july1-latitude-vs0-250k-499px1.pngTOA-Solar-July1-Latitude-vs0-250k-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/toa-solar-july1-latitude-vs0-250k-499px.pngTOA-Solar-July1-Latitude-vs0-250k-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/annual-change-toa-solar-vs-eccentricity.pngAnnual-%Change-TOA-Solar-vs-Eccentricityhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/daily-change-toa-solar-vs-eccentricity.pngDaily-Change-TOA-Solar-vs-Eccentricityhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/toa-solar-total-by-month-and-latitude-present1.pngTOA-solar-total-by-month-and-latitude-presenthttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/toa-solar-total-by-month-and-latitude-present.pngTOA-solar-total-by-month-and-latitude-presentFrom Vardavas & Taylor (2007)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/toa-solar-by-latitude-and-month-present.pngTOA-solar-by-latitude-and-month-presentFrom Vardavas & Taylor (2007)2020-08-22T21:24:53+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/roadmap/back-radiation/2023-10-14T06:47:22+00:00weekly0.6https://scienceofdoom.com/roadmap/earths-energy-budget/2013-12-29T02:42:58+00:00weekly0.6https://scienceofdoom.com/2013/01/30/visualizing-atmospheric-radiation-part-twelve-heating-rates/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-13e-subarctic-summer-profile-temperature-gases-density.pngAtmospheric-radiation-13e-Subarctic-summer-profile-temperature-gases-densityhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-13h-midlatitude-summer-profile-temperature-gases-density.pngAtmospheric-radiation-13h-Midlatitude-summer-profile-temperature-gases-densityhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-13d-heating-rates-3-atmospheres.pngAtmospheric-radiation-13d-Heating-rates-3-atmosphereshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-13a-tropical-profile-temperature-gases-density.pngAtmospheric-radiation-13a-Tropical-profile-temperature-gases-densityhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-13c-heating-rates-tropical-each-h2o-co2-o3.pngAtmospheric-radiation-13c-Heating-rates-tropical-each-H2O-CO2-O32013-12-29T02:40:46+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/roadmap/visualizing-atmospheric-radiation/2021-03-26T18:20:23+00:00weekly0.6https://scienceofdoom.com/2011/03/17/clouds-and-water-vapor-part-four/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/dessler-2008-fig8-addedtext.pngDessler-2008-fig8-addedtexthttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/dessler-2008-fig7-addedtext.pngDessler-2008-fig7-addedtexthttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/dessler-2008-fig7-addedtext1.pngDessler-2008-fig7-addedtextFrom Dessler (2008)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/dessler-2008-fig7-addedtext.pngDessler-2008-fig7-addedtextFrom Dessler (2008)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/dessler-2008-fig6-addedtext.pngDessler-2008-fig6-addedtextFrom Dessler (2008)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/dessler-equation-highlighted-b.pngDessler-Equation-highlighted-bhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/dessler-equation-highlighted-a.pngDessler-Equation-highlighted-ahttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/dessler-2008-fig5-addedtext.pngDessler-2008-fig5-addedtextFrom Dessler (2008)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/dessler-2008-fig4.pngDessler-2008-fig4from Dessler (2008)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/dessler-equation-highlighted.pngDessler-Equation-highlighted2013-12-29T02:23:55+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/09/18/clouds-and-water-vapor-part-three/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/water-vapor-sun-oort-correlations.pngWater-vapor-Sun-Oort-correlationsSun & Oort (1995)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/water-vapor-sun-oort-rh1.pngWater-vapor-Sun-Oort-RHSun & Oort (1995)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/water-vapor-sun-oort-rh.pngWater-vapor-Sun-Oort-RHSun & Oort (1995)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/water-vapor-sun-oort-19951.pngWater-vapor-Sun-Oort-1995Sun & Oort (1995)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/water-vapor-sun-oort-1995.pngWater-vapor-Sun-Oort-1995Sun & Oort (1995)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/water-vapor-trends-sun-oort-19951.pngWater-vapor-trends-Sun-Oort-1995Sun and Oort (1995)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/water-vapor-trends-sun-oort-1995.pngWater-vapor-trends-Sun-Oort-1995Sun and Oort (1995)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/water-vapor-spencer-braswell-1997.pngWater-vapor-Spencer-Braswell-1997From Spencer & Braswell (1997)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/water-vapor-held-soden-resolved-cloud-model-499px.pngWater-vapor-Held-Soden-resolved-cloud-model-499pxHeld and Soden (2000)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/water-vapor-sun-lindzen-1993.pngWater-vapor-Sun-Lindzen-19932019-06-16T10:41:22+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/08/25/clouds-and-water-vapor-part-two/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/water-vapor-new-satellites-soden-2006.pngWater-vapor-new-satellites-Soden-2006https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/water-vapor-limb-sounding-sage-ii-soden-2006-499px.pngWater-vapor-limb-sounding-SAGE-II-Soden-2006-499pxFrom "Frontiers in Climate Modeling" (2006)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/water-vapor-upper-tropospheric-humidity-held-soden-2000.pngWater-vapor-upper-tropospheric-humidity-Held-Soden-2000Upper tropospheric humidity, Held & Soden (2000)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/water-vapor-radiosonde-network-soden-2006-499px.pngwater-vapor-radiosonde-network-soden-2006-499pxFrom "Frontiers of Climate Modeling" (2006)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/water-vapor-satellite-networks-soden-2006.pngWater-vapor-satellite-networks-soden-2006From "Frontiers of Climate Modelling" (2006)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/water-vapor-soden-2006-1b.pngWater-vapor-Soden-2006-1bFrom Soden (2006)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/water-vapor-saturation-mixing-ratio-below-zero.pngwater-vapor-saturation-mixing-ratio-below-zerohttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/water-vapor-saturation-mixing-ratio.pngwater-vapor-saturation-mixing-ratiohttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/radiation-to-increase-10k-vs-temp.pngradiation-to-increase-10k-vs-temphttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/water-vapor-soden-2006-2-499px.pngWater-vapor-Soden-2006-2-499pxWater Vapor Observations, Soden - "Frontiers of Climate Modeling", chapter 102013-12-29T02:21:42+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/08/29/clouds-and-water-vapor-part-one-responses/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/ramanathan-frontiers-greenhouse-effect.pngramanathan-frontiers-greenhouse-effecthttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/change-in-radiation-vs-temperature-stefan-boltzmann.pngChange-in-radiation-vs-temperature-Stefan-Boltzmann2013-12-29T02:20:36+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/05/30/clouds-and-water-vapor-part-one/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/erbe-climate-sensitivity-vs-globecoverage.pngERBE-climate-sensitivity-vs-globecoveragehttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/erbe-ga-vs-ts.pngERBE-Ga-vs-Tshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/erbe-t-ga-watervapor-whole-globe1.pngERBE-T-ga-watervapor-whole-globehttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/erbe-t-ga-watervapor.pngERBE-T-ga-watervaporhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/erbe-normalized-greenhouse-precipitation.pngERBE-normalized-greenhouse-precipitationhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/erbe-cloud-forcing-total1.pngERBE-cloud-forcing-totalhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/erbe-cloud-forcing-total.pngERBE-cloud-forcing-totalhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/erbe-cloud-forcing-sw-olr.pngERBE-cloud-forcing-SW-OLRhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/erbe-albedo-cloudy-clear-1985-1989.pngERBE-albedo-cloudy-clear-1985-1989Albedo, or reflected solar radiation %, from ERBE, 1985-1989https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/erbe-olr-cloudy-clear-1985-1989.pngERBE-OLR-cloudy-clear-1985-1989ERBE OLR for clear and cloudy skies, 1985-19892019-04-20T09:34:12+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2011/12/31/measuring-climate-sensitivity-part-three-eddy-diffusivity/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/mf2010-11-a-0-1-sign-0-95-10000days.pngMF2010-11-a-0.1-SigN-0.95-10000dayshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/mf2010-10-a-0-3-sign-0-95-10000days.pngMF2010-10-a-0.3-SigN-0.95-10000days2013-12-29T01:34:22+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2011/12/23/measuring-climate-sensitivity-part-two-mixed-layer-depths/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/sb2008-ocean-vary-7.pngSB2008-Ocean-vary-7https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/sb2008-ocean-vary-6.pngSB2008-Ocean-vary-6https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/sb2008-ocean-vary-5.pngSB2008-Ocean-vary-5https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/sb2008-ocean-vary-4.pngSB2008-Ocean-vary-4https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/sb2008-ocean-vary-3.pngSB2008-Ocean-vary-3https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/sb2008-ocean-vary-2.pngSB2008-Ocean-vary-2https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/sb2008-ocean-vary-1.pngSB2008-Ocean-vary-1https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/de-boyer-global-mld-by-month.pngde-Boyer-Global-MLD-by-monthFrom de Boyer Montegut et al (2004)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/marshall-plumb-ocean-mixed-layer-global.pngMarshall-Plumb-Ocean-Mixed-Layer-Globalhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/marshall-plumb-ocean-mixed-layer.pngMarshall-Plumb-Ocean-Mixed-LayerFrom Marshall & Plumb (2008)2013-12-29T01:32:30+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2011/09/22/measuring-climate-sensitivity-part-one/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/murphy-forster-2010-fig3b.pngMurphy-Forster-2010-fig3bFrom Murphy & Forster (2010)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/sb2008-9a.pngSB2008-9ahttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/sb2008-9.pngSB2008-9https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/sb2008-4a.pngSB2008-4ahttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/sb2008-4.pngSB2008-4https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/sb2008-8a.pngSB2008-8ahttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/sb2008-8.pngSB2008-8https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/sb2008-6a.pngSB2008-6ahttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/sb2008-6.pngSB2008-6https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/sb2008-1.pngSB2008-12022-07-05T17:27:43+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/roadmap/measuring-climate-sensitivity/2013-12-29T01:28:09+00:00weekly0.6https://scienceofdoom.com/2013/03/03/wonderland-and-radiative-forcing-part-two/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/santer-1996-hotspot.pngSanter-1996-hotspotFrom Santer et al 1996https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/hansen-1997-table4.pngHansen-1997-table4Hansen et al (1997)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/hansen-1997-table2.pngHansen-1997-table2From Hansen et al 1997https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/hansen-1997-plate3-forcings-temperature-2solar.pngHansen-1997-plate3-forcings-temperature-2%SolarFrom Hansen et al (1997)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/hansen-1997-plate2-forcings-temperature-2xco2-annotated.pngHansen-1997-plate2-forcings-temperature-2xCO2-annotatedFrom Hansen et al 1997https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/hansen-1997-plate2-forcings-temperature-2xco2.pngHansen-1997-plate2-forcings-temperature-2xCO2Hansen et al (1997)2015-06-20T11:39:06+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2013/02/21/wonderland-radiative-forcing-and-the-rate-of-inflation/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/hansen-1997-fig4.pngHansen-1997-fig4From Hansen et al (1997)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/hansen-1997-fig2.pngHansen-1997-fig2From Hansen et al (1997)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/wonderland-geography-hansen-1997.pngWonderland-geography-Hansen-1997From Hansen et al (1997)2019-11-23T02:02:26+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2013/02/17/visualizing-atmospheric-radiation-part-thirteen-surface-emissivity/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/atmospheric-radiation-14h-tropical-atm-2xco2-1xco2-emissivity-0-8-1-0.pngAtmospheric-radiation-14h-tropical-atm-2xCO2-1xCO2-emissivity-0.8-1.0https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/atmospheric-radiation-14fg-tropical-atm-2xco2-toa-emissivity-0-8vs1-0.pngAtmospheric-radiation-14fg-tropical-atm-2xCO2-TOA-emissivity-0.8vs1.0https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/atmospheric-radiation-14c-subarctic-winter-atm-toa-emissivity-0-8vs1-0.pngAtmospheric-radiation-14c-subarctic-winter-atm-TOA-emissivity-0.8vs1.0https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/atmospheric-radiation-14b-tropical-atm-toa-emissivity-0-8vs1-0-expanded.pngAtmospheric-radiation-14b-tropical-atm-TOA-emissivity-0.8vs1.0-expandedhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/atmospheric-radiation-14c-midlat-winter-atm-toa-emissivity-0-8vs1-0.pngAtmospheric-radiation-14c-midlat-winter-atm-TOA-emissivity-0.8vs1.0https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/atmospheric-radiation-14b-tropical-atm-toa-emissivity-0-8vs1-0.pngAtmospheric-radiation-14b-tropical-atm-TOA-emissivity-0.8vs1.02013-02-23T06:48:56+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2013/02/07/ceres-airs-outgoing-longwave-radiation-el-nino/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/susskind-2012-table-2.pngSusskind-2012-table-2https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/susskind-2012-fig-7-hovmoller-ts-q-cloud.pngSusskind-2012-Fig-7-Hovmoller-Ts-q-cloudFrom Susskind (2012)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/susskind-2012-airs-elnino-spatial1.pngSusskind-2012-AIRS-ElNino-SpatialFrom Susskind et al (2012)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/susskind-2012-table-1.pngSusskind-2012-table-1https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/susskind-2012-olr-elnino-correlations.pngSusskind-2012-OLR-ElNino-correlationsFrom Susskind (2012)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/susskind-2012-ts-humidity-cloud.pngSusskind-2012-Ts-Humidity-CloudFrom Susskind (2012)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/susskind-time-series-2012.pngSusskind-Time-Series-2012https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/susskind-2012-airs-elnino-spatial.pngSusskind-2012-AIRS-ElNino-SpatialFrom Susskind (2012)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/susskind-2012-ceres-airs-elnino.pngSusskind-2012-CERES-AIRS-ElNinoFrom Susskind et al (2012)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/susskind-ceres-vs-airs-20121.pngSusskind-CERES-vs-AIRS-20122014-08-26T20:58:40+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2011/06/21/whats-the-palaver-kiehl-and-trenberth-1997/2014-03-27T05:24:14+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2013/02/02/kiehl-trenberth-and-the-atmospheric-window/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/costa-shine-fig1-2012-annotated.pngCosta-Shine-fig1-2012-annotatedFrom Costa & Shine (2012)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/costa-shine-fig2-2012-annotated.pngCosta-Shine-fig2-2012-annotatedFrom Costa & Shine (2012)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/costa-shine-fig3-2012.pngCosta-Shine-fig3-2012https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/trenbert-fasullo-kiehl-2009.pngTrenbert-Fasullo-Kiehl-2009From Trenberth, Fasullo & Kiehl (2009)2021-01-23T19:32:48+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2013/01/14/visualizing-atmospheric-radiation-part-eight-co2-under-pressure/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-8m-toa-radiation-difference-280ppm-550-850cm-linewidth-comparison.pngAtmospheric-radiation-8m-TOA-radiation-difference-280ppm-550-850cm-linewidth-comparison2016-03-07T15:53:12+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2013/01/03/visualizing-atmospheric-radiation-part-one/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-2.pngAtmospheric-radiation-2https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-1.pngAtmospheric-radiation-12023-01-13T23:20:11+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2013/01/08/visualizing-atmospheric-radiation-part-three-average-height-of-emission/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-5c-flux-3dcontribution-to-toa-zoom.pngAtmospheric-radiation-5c-Flux-3dcontribution-to-TOA-zoomhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-5a-flux-3dcontribution-to-toa.pngAtmospheric-radiation-5a-Flux-3dcontribution-to-TOAhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-5a-flux-basic-reference-toa.pngAtmospheric-radiation-5a-Flux-Basic-reference-TOAhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-5-flux-contribution-to-toa-excl-surface1.pngAtmospheric-radiation-5-Flux-contribution-to-TOA-excl-surfacehttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-5-flux-contribution-to-toa-inc-surface1.pngAtmospheric-radiation-5-Flux-contribution-to-TOA-inc-surface2021-10-13T18:25:09+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2013/01/09/visualizing-atmospheric-radiation-part-four-water-vapor/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-6f-spectrum-toa-saturated-dry.pngAtmospheric-radiation-6f-Spectrum-TOA-saturated-dryhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-6e-spectrum-dlr-vs-fth.pngAtmospheric-radiation-6e-Spectrum-DLR-vs-FTHhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-6f-dlr-flux-vs-fth.pngAtmospheric-radiation-6f-DLR-flux-vs-FTHhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-6e-spectrum-dlr-vs-tfh.pngAtmospheric-radiation-6e-Spectrum-DLR-vs-TFHhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-6d-spectrum-toa-vs-tfh.pngAtmospheric-radiation-6d-Spectrum-TOA-vs-TFHhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-6d-spectrum-toa-vs-tfh-499px.pngAtmospheric-radiation-6d-Spectrum-TOA-vs-TFH-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-6c-flux-toa-vs-tfh1.pngAtmospheric-radiation-6c-Flux-TOA-vs-TFHhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-6b-flux-dlr-vs-blh1.pngAtmospheric-radiation-6b-Flux-DLR-vs-BLHhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-6a-flux-toa-vs-blh.pngAtmospheric-radiation-6a-Flux-TOA-vs-BLH2017-09-10T12:26:58+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2013/01/10/visualizing-atmospheric-radiation-part-five-the-code/2017-07-18T14:50:16+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2013/01/12/visualizing-atmospheric-radiation-part-six-technical-on-line-shapes/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-7c-mixing-parameter-voigt-by-band.pngAtmospheric-radiation-7c-Mixing-parameter-Voigt-by-bandhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-7b-mixing-parameter-voigt-histogram.pngAtmospheric-radiation-7b-Mixing-parameter-Voigt-histogramhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-7a-mixing-parameter-voigt.pngAtmospheric-radiation-7a-Mixing-parameter-Voigthttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/taylor-vardavas-radiation-and-climate-p87-91-1b.pngTaylor-Vardavas-Radiation-and-Climate-p87-91-1bhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/taylor-vardavas-radiation-and-climate-p87-911.pngTaylor-Vardavas-Radiation-and-Climate-p87-91from Vardavas & Taylor 2007https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/taylor-vardavas-radiation-and-climate-p87-91-2.pngTaylor-Vardavas-Radiation-and-Climate-p87-91-22017-04-22T08:13:36+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2013/01/13/visualizing-atmospheric-radiation-part-seven-co2-increases/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-8k-toa-radiation-difference-280ppm-550-850cm.pngAtmospheric-radiation-8k-TOA-radiation-difference-280ppm-550-850cmhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-8k-toa-radiation-difference-280ppm-550-850cm-expanded.pngAtmospheric-radiation-8k-TOA-radiation-difference-280ppm-550-850cm-expandedhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-8k-toa-radiation-280ppm-550-850cm.pngAtmospheric-radiation-8k-TOA-radiation-280ppm-550-850cmhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-8k-toa-radiation-280ppm-550-850cm-expanded.pngAtmospheric-radiation-8k-TOA-radiation-280ppm-550-850cm-expandedhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-8j-total-trans-difference-280ppm-550-850cm.pngAtmospheric-radiation-8j-total-trans-difference-280ppm-550-850cmhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-8j-total-trans-difference-280ppm-550-850cm-expanded.pngAtmospheric-radiation-8j-total-trans-difference-280ppm-550-850cm-expandedhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-8j-total-trans-280ppm-550-850cm.pngAtmospheric-radiation-8j-total-trans-280ppm-550-850cmhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-8j-total-trans-280ppm-550-850cm-expanded.pngAtmospheric-radiation-8j-total-trans-280ppm-550-850cm-expandedhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-8h-trans-layer1-280ppm-550-850cm-1.pngAtmospheric-radiation-8h-trans-layer1-280ppm-550-850cm-1https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-8h-trans-layer1-280ppm-550-850cm-1-expanded.pngAtmospheric-radiation-8h-trans-layer1-280ppm-550-850cm-1-expanded2015-08-22T20:22:04+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2013/01/20/visualizing-atmospheric-radiation-part-nine-reaching-equilibrium/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-9h-first-100-days-ocean-atmos-toa.pngAtmospheric-radiation-9h-first-100-days-ocean-atmos-TOAhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-9g-temperature-profile-vs-height.pngAtmospheric-radiation-9g-temperature-profile-vs-heighthttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-9f-dynamic-convective-flux-first-30-days.pngAtmospheric-radiation-9f-dynamic-convective-flux-first-30-dayshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-9d-surface-balance-timestep-1.pngAtmospheric-radiation-9d-surface-balance-timestep-1https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-9e-dynamic-toa-surface-first-30-days.pngAtmospheric-radiation-9e-dynamic-TOA-surface-first-30-dayshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-8n-dynamic-toa-surface-288k-12layer-2hr-800-days-360ppm.pngAtmospheric-radiation-8n-dynamic-TOA-surface-288K-12layer-2hr-800-days-360ppmhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-8n-dynamic-288k-12layer-2hr-800-days-360ppm.pngAtmospheric-radiation-8n-dynamic-288K-12layer-2hr-800-days-360ppmhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-8n-solar-heating-rate-model.pngAtmospheric-radiation-8n-solar-heating-rate-model2013-02-08T19:05:52+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2013/01/23/visualizing-atmospheric-radiation-part-ten-back-radiation/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-10f-delta-dlr-toa-280-5601.pngAtmospheric-radiation-10f-Delta-DLR-TOA-280-560https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-10g-dlr-spectrum-288k-280-560.pngAtmospheric-radiation-10g-DLR-spectrum-288K-280-560https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-10e-dlr-toa-280-560.pngAtmospheric-radiation-10e-DLR-TOA-280-560https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-10d-toa-percent-through-window-4-temps.pngAtmospheric-radiation-10d-TOA-percent-through-window-4-tempshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-10a-dlr-4-temps-with-without-continuum1.pngAtmospheric-radiation-10a-DLR-4-temps-with-without-continuumhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-10c-dlr-4-temps-flux-vs-bb.pngAtmospheric-radiation-10c-DLR-4-temps-flux-vs-bbhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-10b-dlr-4-temps-delta-continuum.pngAtmospheric-radiation-10b-DLR-4-temps-delta-continuum2014-01-28T21:52:05+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2013/01/27/visualizing-atmospheric-radiation-part-eleven-stratospheric-cooling/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-12p-delta-flux-profile-pre-post-2xco2-cool-stratosphere.pngAtmospheric-radiation-12p-delta-flux-profile-pre-post-2xCO2-cool-stratospherehttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/hansen-1997-2xco2-radiative-forcing.pnghansen-1997-2xCO2-radiative-forcingFrom Hansen et al (1997)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-12a-flux-profile-pre-post-2xco2.pngAtmospheric-radiation-12a-flux-profile-pre-post-2xCO2https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-12a-flux-profile-pre-post-2xco2-highlight-down-stratosphere.pngAtmospheric-radiation-12a-flux-profile-pre-post-2xCO2-highlight-down-stratospherehttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-12a-flux-profile-pre-post-2xco2-highlight-up-stratosphere.pngAtmospheric-radiation-12a-flux-profile-pre-post-2xCO2-highlight-up-stratospherehttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-12c-temperature-profile.pngAtmospheric-radiation-12c-temperature-profilehttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-12e-upward-spectrum-21-18-pre2xco2.pngAtmospheric-radiation-12e-upward-spectrum-21-18-pre2xCO2https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-12e-upward-spectrum-21-18-post2xco2.pngAtmospheric-radiation-12e-upward-spectrum-21-18-post2xCO2https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-12f-upward-spectrum-21-13-pre-and-post-smoothed.pngAtmospheric-radiation-12f-upward-spectrum-21-13-pre-and-post-smoothedhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-12g-upward-spectrum-21-13-pre.pngAtmospheric-radiation-12g-upward-spectrum-21-13-pre2013-02-07T16:31:26+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2013/01/05/visualizing-atmospheric-radiation-part-two/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-4c-heating.pngAtmospheric-radiation-4c-Heatinghttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-4b-net-flux.pngAtmospheric-radiation-4b-Net-Fluxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-4a-flux.pngAtmospheric-radiation-4a-Fluxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-3c-no-emission-3layers.pngAtmospheric-radiation-3c-no-emission-3layershttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-3c-no-emission.pngAtmospheric-radiation-3c-no-emissionhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-3b-expanded-550-850-499px.pngAtmospheric-radiation-3b-expanded-550-850-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-32.pngAtmospheric-radiation-3https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-3a.pngAtmospheric-radiation-3ahttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/atmospheric-radiation-3.pngAtmospheric-radiation-32017-09-20T08:14:07+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/comments-and-moderation/2022-01-07T17:27:01+00:00weekly0.6https://scienceofdoom.com/2012/09/23/atmospheric-circulation-part-three-instability/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/williams-1988-meridional-temperature-moist-exp-499px.pngWilliams-1988-Meridional-Temperature-Moist-exp-499pxFrom Williams (1988)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/williams-1988-meridional-velocity-moist-exp-499px.pngWilliams-1988-Meridional-velocity-Moist-exp-499pxFrom Williams (1988)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/williams-1988-zonal-velocity-moist-exp-499px.pngWilliams-1988-Zonal-velocity-Moist-exp-499pxFrom Williams (1988)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/angular-momentum-export.pngangular-momentum-exporthttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/angular-momentum-export-mp2008.pngangular-momentum-export-MP2008From Marshall & Plumb (2008)2018-12-06T10:04:10+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/roadmap/gerlich-tscheuschner/2020-08-10T16:20:07+00:00weekly0.6https://scienceofdoom.com/roadmap/atmospheric-circulation/2018-01-22T01:22:39+00:00weekly0.6https://scienceofdoom.com/2012/08/25/atmospheric-circulation-part-two/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/thermal-wind-measurement-mp20081.pngThermal-wind-measurement-MP2008From Marshall & Plumb (2008)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/thermal-wind-measurement-mp2008.pngThermal-wind-measurement-MP2008From Marshall & Plumb (2008)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/thermal-wind-intuition-stull.pngThermal-wind-intuition-StullFrom Stull (1999)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/thermal-wind-experiment-result-mp2008.pngThermal-wind-experiment-result-MP2008https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/thermal-wind-experiment-mp2008.pngThermal-wind-experiment-MP2008From Marshall & Plumb (2008)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/taylor-columns-snapshots-from-video-mp2008.pngTaylor-columns-snapshots-from-video-MP2008https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/taylor-columns-mp2008.pngTaylor-columns-MP2008From Marshall & Plumb (2008)2012-09-03T23:32:32+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2012/08/21/atmospheric-circulation-part-one/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/zonal-average-ew-winds-marshall-plumb-2008.pngZonal-average-EW-winds-Marshall-Plumb-2008From Marshall & Plumb (2008)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/hadley-experiment-fast-marshall-plumb-2008.pngHadley-experiment-fast-Marshall-Plumb-2008From Marshall & Plumb (2008)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/hadley-experiment-slow-marshall-plumb-2008.pngHadley-experiment-slow-Marshall-Plumb-2008https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/hadley-experiment-baroclinic-instability-goody-1972-atmospheres1.pngHadley-experiment-baroclinic-instability-Goody-1972-Atmosphereshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/hadley-experiment-baroclinic-instability-goody-1972-atmospheres.pngHadley-experiment-baroclinic-instability-Goody-1972-AtmospheresFrom Goody & Walker (1972)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/pressure-force-goody-1972-atmospheres.pngPressure-force-Goody-1972-AtmospheresFrom Goody (1972)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/meridional-overturning-circulation-marshall-plumb-2008.pngMeridional Overturning Circulation-Marshall-Plumb-2008From Marshall & Plumb (2008)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/hadley-circulation-hypothetical-mp2008.pngHadley circulation hypothetical-MP2008From Marshall & Plumb (2008)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/500mbar-mean-height-jan2003-mp2008-499px.png500mbar-mean-height-Jan2003-MP2008-499pxFrom Marshall & Plumb (2008)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/geopotential-height-marshall-plumb-2008.pngGeopotential-height-Marshall-Plumb-2008From Marshall & Plumb (2008)2012-09-20T13:03:12+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2012/08/12/temperature-profile-in-the-atmosphere-the-lapse-rate/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/lapserate-july-stone-carlson-1979.pngLapseRate-July-Stone-Carlson-1979From Stone & Carlson (1979)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/lapserate-january-stone-carlson-1979.pngLapseRate-January-Stone-Carlson-1979From Stone & Carlson (1979)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/lapse-rate-5.pngLapse-rate-5https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/lapse-rate-42.pngLapse-rate-4https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/lapse-rate-41.pngLapse-rate-4https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/lapse-rate-4.pngLapse-rate-4https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/lapse-rate-31.pngLapse-rate-3https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/lapse-rate-3.pngLapse-rate-3https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/lapse-rate-2a1.pngLapse-rate-2ahttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/lapse-rate-2a.pngLapse-rate-2a2017-05-12T18:25:07+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2012/07/23/how-the-greenhouse-effect-works-a-guest-post-and-discussion/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/lw-ball-radiation-shield-groupz-1.pngLW-ball-radiation-shield-GroupZ-1https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/lw-ball-radiation-shield-groupz-chap0.pngLW-ball-radiation-shield-GroupZ-chap0https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/lw-ball-radiation-shield-groupz.pngLW-ball-radiation-shield-GroupZhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/lw-ball-radiation-shield.pngLW-ball-radiation-shieldhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/lw-ball-insulated-2.pngLW-ball-insulated-22016-07-17T01:28:46+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2012/07/15/visualizing-the-climate-response/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/soden-2008-overall-climate-feedbacks.pngSoden-2008-Overall-Climate-FeedbacksSoden et al (2008)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/soden-2008-humidity-solar1.pngSoden-2008-Humidity-SolarFrom Soden et al (2008)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/soden-2008-humidity-solar.pngSoden-2008-Humidity-SolarFrom Soden et al (2008)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/soden-2008-humidity.pngSoden-2008-HumidityFrom Soden et al (2008)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/soden-2008-temperature.pngSoden-2008-TemperatureFrom Soden et al (2008)2012-07-22T03:08:40+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2012/02/09/density-stability-and-motion-in-fluids/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/convection-mp2008-videolinkgaphic.pngconvection-MP2008-videolinkgaphichttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/buoyancy-mp2008.pngBuoyancy-MP2008From Marshall & Plumb (2008)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/stable-unstable.pngStable-unstable2012-02-12T01:53:05+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2012/02/12/potential-temperature/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/moist-potential-temperature-mp2008-499px.pngMoist potential temperature-MP2008-499pxFrom Marshall & Plumb (2008)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/potential-temperature-example.pngPotential-temperature-examplehttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/potential-temperature-vs-pressure-vs-latitude-mp2008-499px.pngPotential-temperature-vs-pressure-vs-latitude-MP2008-499pxFrom Marshall & Plumb (2008)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/temperature-vs-pressure-vs-latitude-mp2008-499px.pngTemperature-vs-pressure-vs-latitude-MP2008-499pxFrom Marshall & Plumb (2008)2017-10-28T21:26:12+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2012/01/30/blah-blah-blah-vs-equations/2012-06-22T09:01:37+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2012/01/15/the-coriolis-effect-and-geostrophic-motion/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/cross-isobaric-motion-surface.pngCross-isobaric-motion-surfaceFrom Marshall & Plumb (2008)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/geostrophic-motion-500mbar.pngGeostrophic-motion-500mbarFrom Marshall & Plumb (2008)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/geostrophic-balance-mp2008.pngGeostrophic-balance-MP2008From Marshall & Plumb (2008)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/coriolis-mp20081.pngcoriolis-mp2008https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/coriolis-mp2008.pngcoriolis-mp20082014-08-25T03:27:17+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2012/01/11/the-rotational-effect/2013-01-06T04:13:05+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2012/01/05/kramm-dlugi-on-dodging-the-greenhouse-bullet/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/goody-p4.pngGoody-p42016-03-29T23:49:01+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2012/01/03/kramm-dlugi-on-illuminating-the-confusion-of-the-unclear/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/kramm-dlugi-2011-eqn.pngKramm-Dlugi-2011-eqn2014-08-01T01:42:22+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/roadmap/statistics-and-climate/2014-09-03T14:38:19+00:00weekly0.6https://scienceofdoom.com/2011/11/17/the-creation-of-time/2011-12-21T12:27:26+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/etiquette/2015-05-10T21:00:08+00:00weekly0.6https://scienceofdoom.com/2011/09/02/radiative-forcing-and-the-surface-energy-balance/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/surface-tropospheric-forcing-andrews-2009.pngSurface-Tropospheric-Forcing-Andrews-2009From Andrews et al (2009)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/surface-balance-ramanathan-1981.pngSurface-balance-Ramanathan-1981https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/surface-balance-graphic-1d-499px.pngSurface-balance-graphic-1d-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/surface-balance-ramanathan-1998.pngSurface-balance-Ramanathan-1998From Ramanathan (1998)2015-03-21T21:46:52+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2011/08/28/statistics-and-climate-%e2%80%93-part-five-%e2%80%93-arn/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/fit-ar5-yule-walker-pop-5e6-ntest-1e6.pngFit-AR5-Yule-Walker-pop-5e6-ntest-1e6https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/fit-ar5-yule-walker-pop-5e6-ntest-1e6-text-results.pngFit-AR5-Yule-Walker-pop-5e6-ntest-1e6-text-resultshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/fit-ar3-yule-walker-pop-5e6-ntest-1e6-text-results.pngFit-AR3-Yule-Walker-pop-5e6-ntest-1e6-text-resultshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/fit-ar3-yule-walker-pop-5e6-ntest-1e6.pngFit-AR3-Yule-Walker-pop-5e6-ntest-1e6https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/fit-ar2-yule-walker-pop-1e6-ntest-1e5-text-results.pngFit-AR2-Yule-Walker-pop-1e6-ntest-1e5-text-resultshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/fit-ar2-yule-walker-pop-1e6-ntest-1e5.pngFit-AR2-Yule-Walker-pop-1e6-ntest-1e5https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/typei-error-ar2-assumed-ar1-95-t-test.pngTypeI-error-AR2-assumed-AR1-95-t-testhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/gamma-pdf.pngGamma-pdfhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/typei-error-ar1-vs-noise-type-95-t-test.pngTypeI-error-AR1-vs-noise-type-95-t-test2014-04-16T17:11:36+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2011/08/10/statistics-and-climate-%e2%80%93-part-four-%e2%80%93-autocorrelation/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/typei-error-ar1-vs-samplesize-best-estimate-phi-95-t-test.pngTypeI-error-AR1-vs-samplesize-best-estimate-phi-95-t-testhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/zwiers-von-storch-1995.pngZwiers-von-Storch-1995from Zwiers & von Storch (1995)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/typei-error-ar1-vs-samplesize-knownphi-95-t-test.pngTypeI-error-AR1-vs-samplesize-knownphi-95-t-testhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/typei-error-ar1-correction-vs-nocorrection-95-t-test.pngTypeI-error-AR1-correction-vs-nocorrection-95-t-testhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/typei-error-ar1-correction-t-test.pngTypeI-error-AR1-correction-t-testhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/typei-error-ar1-no-correction-t-test.pngTypeI-error-AR1-no-correction-t-testhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/wilks-p146-autocorrelated-samples.pngWilks-p146-autocorrelated-samplesFrom Wilks (2011)2014-05-15T06:19:19+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2011/07/31/statistics-and-climate-%e2%80%93-part-three-autocorrelation/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/fft-from-50hz-1sec.pngFft-from-50Hz-1sechttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/sine-with-noise-plus-fft.pngSine-with-noise-plus-ffthttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/sine-plus-fft.pngSine-plus-ffthttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/ar1-timebase-100.pngAR1-timebase-100https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/ar1-frequency-10000.pngAR1-frequency-10000https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/ar1-timebase-10000.pngAR1-timebase-10000https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/ithaca-jan-1987-normdist-correlation.pngIthaca-Jan-1987-normdist-correlationhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/ithaca-jan-1987-normal-dist-comparison.pngIthaca-Jan-1987-normal-dist-comparisonhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/ithaca-jan-1987-correlation-maxtemp.pngIthaca-Jan-1987-correlation-maxtemphttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/ithaca-jan-1987-maxtemp.pngIthaca-Jan-1987-maxtempData from Wilks (2011)2011-08-22T20:17:04+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2011/07/28/statistics-and-climate-%e2%80%93-part-two/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/central-limit-theorem-matlab-diff-sample-sizes.pngCentral-limit-theorem-matlab--diff-sample-sizeshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/central-limit-theorem-matlab-typei-ii-991.pngCentral-limit-theorem-matlab-TypeI-II-99https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/central-limit-theorem-matlab-typei-ii-99a1.pngCentral-limit-theorem-matlab-TypeI-II-99ahttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/central-limit-theorem-matlab-typei-ii-999a.pngCentral-limit-theorem-matlab-TypeI-II-999ahttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/central-limit-theorem-matlab-typei-ii-99a.pngCentral-limit-theorem-matlab-TypeI-II-99ahttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/central-limit-theorem-matlab-typei-ii-95a.pngCentral-limit-theorem-matlab-TypeI-II-95ahttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/central-limit-theorem-matlab-typei-ii-99.pngCentral-limit-theorem-matlab-TypeI-II-99https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/central-limit-theorem-matlab-typei-ii.pngCentral-limit-theorem-matlab-TypeI-IIhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/typei-typeii-summary-brase-2009.pngTypeI-TypeII-summary-Brase-2009https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/central-limit-theorem-matlab-21.pngCentral-limit-theorem-matlab-22011-12-24T10:14:13+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2011/07/24/statistics-and-climate-part-one/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/central-limit-theorem.pngCentral-limit-theoremhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/stats-normal-weight.pngstats-normal-weight2013-03-02T01:35:02+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2011/07/03/models-on-%e2%80%93-and-off-%e2%80%93-the-catwalk-%e2%80%93-part-three/2020-03-20T00:13:56+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2011/06/12/paradigm-shifts-in-convection-and-water-vapor/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/marshall-adiabats-and-mixing.pngMarshall-adiabats-and-mixingFrom Marshall & Plumb (2008)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/marshall-adiabats-and-typical.pngMarshall-adiabats-and-typicalFrom Marshall & Plumb (2008)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/marshall-rh-vs-height-latitude.pngMarshall-RH-vs-height-latitudeFrom Marshall & Plumb (2008)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/gilbert-2010.pngGilbert-2010From Gilbert (2010)2017-08-08T21:54:33+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2011/06/02/water-vapor-trends/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/trenberth-2005-iwv-1988-2001-geographical-trends-various-datasets.pngTrenberth-2005-IWV-1988-2001-geographical-trends-various-datasetsFrom Trenberth et al (2005)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/trenberth-2005-iwv-1988-2001-geographical-trends-various-datasets-499px.pngTrenberth-2005-IWV-1988-2001-geographical-trends-various-datasets-499pxFrom Trenberth et al (2005)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/trenberth-2005-iwv-1988-2001-geographical-various-datasets.pngTrenberth-2005-IWV-1988-2001-geographical-various-datasetsTrenberth et al (2005)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/trenberth-2005-iwv-1988-2001-geographical-various-datasets-499px.pngTrenberth-2005-IWV-1988-2001-geographical-various-datasets-499pxTrenberth et al (2005)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/trenberth-smith-2005-mass-of-atmosphere.pngTrenberth-Smith-2005-mass-of-atmospherefrom Trenberth & Smith (2005)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/trenberth-2005-iwv-1988-2001-various-datasets2.pngTrenberth-2005-IWV-1988-2001-various-datasetshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/trenberth-2005-iwv-1988-2001-various-datasets1.pngTrenberth-2005-IWV-1988-2001-various-datasetsFrom Trenberth et al (2005)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/trenberth-2005-iwv-1988-2001-various-datasets.pngTrenberth-2005-IWV-1988-2001-various-datasetsFrom Trenberth et al (2005)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/trenberth-2005-iwv-499px.pngTrenberth-2005-IWV-499pxFrom Trenbert et al (2005)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/reanalysis-3.pngreanalysis-32024-01-17T10:19:37+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2011/06/05/water-vapor-trends-part-two/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/dessler-2010-short-vs-long.pngDessler-2010-short-vs-longFrom Dessler & Davis (2010)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/paltridge-2009-map.pngPaltridge-2009-mapfrom Paltridge et al (2009)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/paltridge-2009.pngPaltridge-2009From Paltridge et al (2009)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/brown-2007-pw-trends-map-topex.pngBrown-2007-PW-trends-map-TOPEXFrom Brown et al (2007)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/brown-2007-pw-table-topex.pngBrown-2007-PW-table-TOPEXFrom Brown et al (2007)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/brown-2007-pw-trends-topex-499px.pngBrown-2007-PW-trends-TOPEX-499pxFrom Brown et al (2007)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/durre-2009-pw-trends-table.pngDurre-2009-PW-trends-tableFrom Durre et al (2009)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/durre-2009-pw-trend-map.pngDurre-2009-PW-trend-mapFrom Durre et al (2009)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/durre-2009-pw-trends.pngDurre-2009-PW-trendsFrom Durre et al (2009)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/soden-et-al-2005-water-vapor-ssmi.pngSoden-et-al-2005-Water-vapor-SSMIFrom Soden et al (2005)2017-01-02T03:35:22+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2011/04/26/the-mystery-of-tau-%e2%80%93-miskolczi-%e2%80%93-part-three-kinetic-energy/2011-06-22T06:42:16+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2011/04/25/the-mystery-of-tau-miskolczi-part-two-kirchhoff/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/planck-theoryofheatradiation-extract.pngPlanck-theoryofheatradiation-extracthttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/miskolczi-aa-ed-theory-comparison.pngMiskolczi-Aa-Ed-theory-comparisonhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/miskolczi-fig2.pngMiskolczi-fig2From Miskolczi (2007)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/miskolczi-diagram.pngMiskolczi-diagramFrom Miskolczi (2007)2011-08-29T15:24:44+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2011/04/22/the-mystery-of-tau-miskolczi/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/mysteryoftau-12.pngmysteryoftau-1https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/clouds-hartmann-1994.pngClouds-Hartmann-1994From Hartmann (1994)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/clouds-taylor2007.pngclouds-Taylor2007From Vardavas & Taylor (2007)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/mysteryoftau-11.pngmysteryoftau-1https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/mysteryoftau-1.pngmysteryoftau-12011-08-14T01:11:11+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2011/05/01/the-mystery-of-tau-%e2%80%93-miskolczi-%e2%80%93-part-four-%e2%80%93-emissivity/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/miskolczi-aa-ed-theory-vs-em-dt-3.pngMiskolczi-Aa-Ed-theory-vs-em-dt-3https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/miskolczi-aa-ed-theory-vs-em.pngMiskolczi-Aa-Ed-theory-vs-emhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/miskolczi-aa-ed-theory-with-em-1.pngMiskolczi-Aa-Ed-theory-with-em-1https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/miskolczi-fig2-revised2.pngMiskolczi-fig2-revisedhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/miskolczi-fig2-revised1.pngMiskolczi-fig2-revisedhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/miskolczi-fig2-revised.pngMiskolczi-fig2-revised2011-08-30T22:01:37+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2011/05/15/the-mystery-of-tau-%e2%80%93-miskolczi-%e2%80%93-part-five-equation-souffle/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/sga-model1.pngSGA-modelhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/miskolczi-2007-eq20-21.pngMiskolczi-2007-eq20-21https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/miskolczi-2007-b11.pngMiskolczi-2007-B11https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/miskolczi-2007-b10-fixed1.pngMiskolczi-2007-B10-fixedhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/miskolczi-2007-b10-fixed.pngMiskolczi-2007-B10-fixedhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/miskolczi-2007-b9-10.pngMiskolczi-2007-B9-10https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/miskolczi-2007-b7.pngMiskolczi-2007-B7https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/sgm-graph-temperature-height.pngSGM-graph-temperature-heighthttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/sgm-graph-temperature.pngSGM-graph-temperaturehttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/miskolczi-2007-b1-b3-higlightb3.pngMiskolczi-2007-B1-B3-higlightB32011-09-03T00:59:42+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2011/05/28/the-mystery-of-tau-%e2%80%93-miskolczi-part-six-minor-ghgs/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/sample-co2-h2ominor-gases-transmittance-spectrum.pngSample-CO2-H2O+minor-gases-transmittance-spectrumhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/tau-over-time-co2-ch4-n2o-1948-2008.pngTau-over-time-CO2-CH4-N2O-1948-20082011-12-20T20:22:22+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/roadmap/miskolczi/2011-11-30T06:33:41+00:00weekly0.6https://scienceofdoom.com/2011/02/09/understanding-atmospheric-radiation-and-the-%e2%80%9cgreenhouse%e2%80%9d-effect-%e2%80%93-part-seven/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/rte-5-0-run9-12-comparison.pngRTE-5.0-Run9-12-comparisonhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/rte-5-0-run8-499px.pngRTE-5.0-Run8-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/rte-5-0-run1-4-comparison-rf.pngRTE-5.0-Run1-4-comparison-RFhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/rte-5-0-run1-4-comparison.pngRTE-5.0-Run1-4-comparisonhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/rte-5-0-run4-499px.pngRTE-5.0-Run4-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/rte-5-0-run3-499px.pngRTE-5.0-Run3-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/rte-5-0-run2-400px.pngRTE-5.0-Run2-400pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/rte-5-0-run1-499px.pngRTE-5.0-Run1-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/rte-5-0-run1-4-absorption-characteristics.pngRTE-5.0-Run1-4-Absorption-characteristicshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/rte-5-0-run1-absorption-characteristics.pngRTE-5.0-Run1-Absorption-characteristics2016-03-07T16:04:48+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2011/03/07/understanding-atmospheric-radiation-and-the-%e2%80%9cgreenhouse%e2%80%9d-effect-%e2%80%93-part-eight/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/petty-co2-transmission-over-1m-path.pngPetty-CO2-transmission-over-1m-pathFrom Grant Petty (2006)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/co2-zenith-transmittance-petty.pngCO2-Zenith-Transmittance-PettyFrom "A First Course in Atmospheric Radiation", Grant Petty (2006)2012-01-10T11:18:57+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2011/03/12/understanding-atmospheric-radiation-and-the-%e2%80%9cgreenhouse%e2%80%9d-effect-%e2%80%93-part-nine/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/rte-lbl-15layer-200mb-280-560ppm.pngRTE-LBL-15layer-200mb-280-560ppmhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/rte-lbl-15layer-200mb-280vs560ppm.pngRTE-LBL-15layer-200mb-280vs560ppmhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/rte-lbl-15layer-200mb-360ppm.pngRTE-LBL-15layer-200mb-360ppmhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/rte-lbl-tau-1000mb-vs-200mb-100m-640-650.pngRTE-LBL-Tau-1000mb-vs-200mb-100m-640-650https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/rte-lbl-200mb-216k-370meter-640-650.pngRTE-LBL-200mb-216K-370meter-640-650https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/rte-lbl-1000mb-296k-100meter-640-650.pngRTE-LBL-1000mb-296K-100meter-640-650https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/rte-lbl-1013mb-1000meter-500-850.pngRTE-LBL-1013mb-1000meter-500-850https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/rte-lbl-200mb-216k-3-7meter-600-750.pngRTE-LBL-200mb-216K-3.7meter-600-750https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/rte-lbl-1013mb-1meter-600-750.pngRTE-LBL-1013mb-1meter-600-750https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/rte-lbl-200mb-216k-3-7meter-667-6692.pngRTE-LBL-200mb-216K-3.7meter-667-6692016-09-28T18:39:03+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2011/04/21/understanding-atmospheric-radiation-and-the-%e2%80%9cgreenhouse%e2%80%9d-effect-%e2%80%93-part-eleven-heating-rates/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/petty-longwave-heating-rates-3.pngPetty-longwave-heating-rates-3From Petty (2006)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/petty-longwave-heating-rates-2.pngPetty-longwave-heating-rates-2From Petty (2006)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/petty-longwave-heating-rates.pngPetty-longwave-heating-ratesFrom Petty (2006)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/petty-shortwave-heating-rates.pngPetty-shortwave-heating-ratesFrom Grant Petty (2006)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/rte-density-vs-height.pngRTE-density-vs-height2023-01-21T22:45:59+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2011/04/30/understanding-atmospheric-radiation-and-the-%e2%80%9cgreenhouse%e2%80%9d-effect-%e2%80%93-part-twelve-curve-of-growth/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/rte-transmittance-change-vs-percentoflines.pngRTE-transmittance-change-vs-percentoflineshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/rte-transmittance-change-all-lines-vs-top1pc.pngRTE-transmittance-change-all-lines-vs-top1pchttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/rte-transmittance-change-all-lines-vs-top10pc.pngRTE-transmittance-change-all-lines-vs-top10pchttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/rte-av-transmittance-change-vs-linewidth-280ppm1.pngRTE-av-transmittance-change-vs-linewidth-280ppmhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/rte-transmittance-change-with-line-width-560ppm.pngRTE-transmittance-change-with-line-width-560ppmhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/rte-av-transmittance-change-vs-linewidth-280ppm.pngRTE-av-transmittance-change-vs-linewidth-280ppmhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/rte-transmittance-change-with-line-width-ca-100-280ppm.pngRTE-transmittance-change-with-line-width-ca-100-280ppmhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/rte-transmittance-change-with-line-width-280ppm.pngRTE-transmittance-change-with-line-width-280ppmhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/rte-cog-vs-average2-380px.pngRTE-COG-vs-average2-380pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/rte-cog-vs-masspath-annotated.pngRTE-COG-vs-masspath-annotated2011-05-15T08:24:18+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/02/26/new-theory-proves-agw-wrong/2011-11-08T15:21:35+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2011/04/07/simple-atmospheric-models-%e2%80%93-part-two/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/taylor-stratosphere.pngTaylor-stratospherehttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/petty-atmospheric-transmittance1.pngPetty-atmospheric-transmittancehttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/petty-atmospheric-transmittance.pngPetty-atmospheric-transmittancehttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/planck-5780-255-215-0-50um.pngPlanck-5780-255-215-0-50umhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/taylor-elementaryclimatephysics-p47.pngTaylor-ElementaryClimatePhysics-p472011-04-19T20:32:26+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2011/04/05/simple-atmospheric-models-part-one/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/planck-250-275-300k-0-50um.pngPlanck-250-275-300K-0-50umhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/simple-model-taylor-ch7-1.pngSimple-model-Taylor-ch7-12012-11-07T10:55:10+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2011/02/07/understanding-atmospheric-radiation-and-the-%e2%80%9cgreenhouse%e2%80%9d-effect-%e2%80%93-part-six-the-equations/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/diffusivity-approx.pngDiffusivity-approxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/rte-ray2.pngRTE-ray2https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/transmittance-vs-angle.pngTransmittance-vs-anglehttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/beer-lambert-law-2.pngbeer-lambert-law-2https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/rte-ray1.pngRTE-ray1https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/integral1.pngintegralhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/integral.pngintegralhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/rte-4-ray.pngRTE-4-rayhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/taylor-no2-spectrum.pngTaylor-NO2-spectrumFrom Vardavas & Taylor (2007)2021-04-22T22:18:35+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2011/02/26/find-stuff-out-and-book-reviews/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/petty-extract.pngpetty-extracthttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/petty-cover.pngpetty-coverhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/schroeder-cover.pngschroeder-coverhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/taylor-ch4-extract1.pngTaylor-ch4-extracthttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/taylor-ch4-extract.pngTaylor-ch4-extracthttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/taylor-cover.pngtaylor-coverhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/hartmann-ch11-extract.pngHartmann-ch11-extracthttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/hartmann-ch4-extract.pngHartmann-ch4-extracthttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/hartmann-contents.pngHartmann-contentshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/hartmann-cover.pngHartmann-cover2012-06-04T20:17:44+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2011/02/24/water-vapor-vs-co2-as-a-greenhouse-gas/2015-06-30T00:03:39+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/12/23/understanding-atmospheric-radiation-and-the-greenhouse-effect-part-one/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/radiation-transfer-diagram1.pngRadiation-transfer-diagram1https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/planck-288k.pngplanck-288Khttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/atmospheric-radiation-impact-energy.pngAtmospheric-radiation-impact-energyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/atmospheric-radiation-impact1.pngAtmospheric-radiation-impacthttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/atmospheric-radiation-impact.pngAtmospheric-radiation-impacthttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/ceres_ebaf-toa-terra_ed2-5_toa_longwave_flux-all_january-2009todecember-2009.pngCERES_EBAF-TOA-Terra_Ed2.5_TOA_Longwave_Flux-ALL_January-2009toDecember-2009https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/ceres_ebaf-toa-terra_ed2-5_toa_longwave_flux-all_december-2009-499px.pngCERES_EBAF-TOA-Terra_Ed2.5_TOA_Longwave_Flux-ALL_December-2009-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/ceres_ebaf-toa-terra_ed2-5_toa_longwave_flux-all_november-2009-499px.pngCERES_EBAF-TOA-Terra_Ed2.5_TOA_Longwave_Flux-ALL_November-2009-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/ceres_ebaf-toa-terra_ed2-5_toa_longwave_flux-all_october-2009-499px.pngCERES_EBAF-TOA-Terra_Ed2.5_TOA_Longwave_Flux-ALL_October-2009-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/ceres_ebaf-toa-terra_ed2-5_toa_longwave_flux-all_september-2009-499px.pngCERES_EBAF-TOA-Terra_Ed2.5_TOA_Longwave_Flux-ALL_September-2009-499px2023-07-22T16:25:16+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2011/01/23/understanding-atmospheric-radiation-and-the-%e2%80%9cgreenhouse%e2%80%9d-effect-%e2%80%93-part-two/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/atmosphere-h2o-mixing-rte0-2.pngatmosphere-h2o-mixing-rte0.2https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/atmosphere-rte0-2.pngatmosphere-rte0.2https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/rte-abs-only-summary1.pngRTE-abs-only-summaryhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/beer-lambert-law-1.pngbeer-lambert-law-12015-03-27T14:09:31+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2011/01/30/understanding-atmospheric-radiation-and-the-%e2%80%9cgreenhouse%e2%80%9d-effect-%e2%80%93-part-three/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/ipcc-log-graph-400px.pngipcc-log-graph-400pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/rte-3-rf-compare-emission-no-emission.pngRTE-3-RF-compare-emission-no-emissionhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/rte-3-compare-emission-no-emission.pngRTE-3-compare-emission-no-emissionhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/rte-3-with-emission-10-runs-499px.pngRTE-3-with-emission-10-runs-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/rte-3-with-emission-10-runs.pngRTE-3-with-emission-10-runshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/rte-3-no-emission-10-runs-499px.pngRTE-3-no-emission-10-runs-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/rte-3-no-emission-10-runs.pngRTE-3-no-emission-10-runs2014-04-16T13:09:56+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2011/02/03/understanding-atmospheric-radiation-and-the-%e2%80%9cgreenhouse%e2%80%9d-effect-%e2%80%93-part-four/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/rte-4-0-overlapping-absorption-characteristics1.pngRTE-4.0-overlapping-absorption-characteristicshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/rte-4-0-mixing-ratios.pngRTE-4.0-mixing-ratioshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/rte-4-0-overlapping-absorption-characteristics.pngRTE-4.0-overlapping-absorption-characteristicshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/rte-4-0-overlapping-499px.pngRTE-4.0-overlapping-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/rte-3-3-lapse-rate-vs-flux-499px.pngRTE-3.3-lapse-rate-vs-flux-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/rte-4-isothermal-499px1.pngRTE-4-isothermal-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/rte-3-3-stability-test2-499px.pngRTE-3.3-stability-test2-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/rte-3-3-stability-test-499px.pngRTE-3.3-stability-test-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/rte-3-3-with-emission-10-runs-l-6-5-toa17-499px.pngRTE-3.3-with-emission-10-runs-l-6.5-toa17-499px2011-08-26T16:21:30+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2011/02/06/understanding-atmospheric-radiation-and-the-%e2%80%9cgreenhouse%e2%80%9d-effect-%e2%80%93-part-five/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/rte-4-0-overlapping-isothermal-strat-499px.pngRTE-4.0-overlapping-isothermal-strat-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/rte-4-0-overlapping-colder-strat-499px.pngRTE-4.0-overlapping-colder-strat-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/rte-4-0-overlapping-comparison-strat-temp-linear.pngRTE-4.0-overlapping-comparison-strat-temp-linearhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/rte-4-0-overlapping-comparison-strat-temp.pngRTE-4.0-overlapping-comparison-strat-temphttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/rte-4-0-overlapping-dlr-focus-extract.pngRTE-4.0-overlapping-DLR-focus-extract2016-10-07T13:44:59+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2011/01/18/the-cool-skin-of-the-ocean/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/skin-temp-graph5-ward-2006.pngSkin-temp-graph5-Ward-2006https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/skin-temp-graph4-ward-2006.pngSkin-temp-graph4-Ward-2006https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/skin-temp-graph3-ward-2006.pngSkin-temp-graph3-Ward-2006https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/skin-temp-graph2-ward-2006.pngSkin-temp-graph2-Ward-2006https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/skin-temp-graph1-ward-20061.pngSkin-temp-graph1-Ward-2006https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/skin-temp-graph1-ward-2006.pngSkin-temp-graph1-Ward-2006https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/skin-temperature-ward-2006-annotated.pngSkin-temperature-Ward-2006-annotatedhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/viscous-sublayer-lienhard.pngViscous-sublayer-Lienhard2013-12-07T15:32:55+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2011/01/06/does-back-radiation-%e2%80%9cheat%e2%80%9d-the-ocean-%e2%80%93-part-four/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/skin-layer-effect-tttm1.pngskin-layer-effect-TTTMhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/timthetoolman-sst-diagram.jpgTimTheToolMan-SST Diagramhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/p98-heatflows.pngp98-heatflowshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/ocean-model-dlr-s-631-15yr-9levels-499px.pngOcean-model-DLR-S-631-15yr-9levels-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/ocean-model-dlr-d-350-15yr-9levels-499px.pngOcean-model-DLR-D-350-15yr-9levels-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/ocean-model-d-343-tair-285-5yr-9levels-499px.pngOcean-model-D-343-Tair-285-5yr-9levels-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/ocean-model-normal-tair-285-5yr-9levels-499px.pngOcean-model-normal-Tair-285-5yr-9levels-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/summary-results-9-layer-model-tair-285.pngSummary-results-9-layer-model-Tair-285https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/summary-results-9-layer-model.pngSummary-results-9-layer-modelhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/summary-results-5-layer-model.pngSummary-results-5-layer-model2016-05-04T12:18:46+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/07/17/the-amazing-case-of-back-radiation/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/dlr-billings-ok-1993-3days.pngDLR-Billings-OK-1993-3daysData from the BSRN network, courtesy of the World Radiation Monitoring Centerhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/dlr-billings-ok-1993-2wks1.pngDLR-Billings-OK-1993-2wksData from the BSRN network, courtesy of the World Radiation Monitoring Centerhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/dlr-billings-ok-1993-2wks.pngDLR-Billings-OK-1993-2wksData from the BSRN network, courtesy of the World Radiation Monitoring Centerhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/station-list-morcrette.pngstation-list-morcrettehttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/station-list-morcrette-499px.pngstation-list-morcrette-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/dlr-many-stations-morcrette-2002-499px.pngDLR-many-stations-Morcrette-2002-499pxMorcrette (2002)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/dlr-many-stations-wild-2001.pngDLR-many-stations-Wild-2001https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/dlr-many-stations-wild-2001-499px.pngDLR-many-stations-Wild-2001-499pxWild (2001)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/dlr-wild-2001-average.pngDLR-Wild-2001-averagehttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/dlr-wild-2001.pngDLR-Wild-2001Data from GEBA for selected stations, Wild et al (2001)2018-08-03T14:58:13+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/07/31/the-amazing-case-of-back-radiation-part-three/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/ebex-theoretical-radiation1.pngebex-theoretical-radiationCalculated (theoretical) upward radiation, 14 August 2000https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/ebex-temperature.pngebex-temperatureTemperature for 14 August 2000, from Wim Kohsiek, private communicationhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/ebex-setup-radiation-measurements1.pngebex-setup-radiation-measurementsUpward and downward radiation measurements, EBEX 2000, Kohsiek (2007)2025-12-22T07:47:19+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/07/24/the-amazing-case-of-back-radiation-part-two/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/rayleigh-scattering-cm-11.pngRayleigh-scattering-cm-1https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/rayleigh-scattering.pngRayleigh-scatteringhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/dlr-spectrum-pacific-lubin-1995.pngDLR-Spectrum-Pacific-Lubin-1995Pacific, Lubin (1995)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/dlr-spectrum-wisconsin-ellingson-1996.pngDLR-Spectrum-Wisconsin-Ellingson-1996Wisconsin, Ellingson & Wiscombe (1996)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/dlr-billings-ok-1993-3days1.pngDLR-Billings-OK-1993-3daysData from the BSRN network, courtesy of the World Radiation Monitoring Centerhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/dlr-spectrum-antarctica-walden-19981.pngDLR-Spectrum-Antarctica-Walden-1998Antarctica - Walden (1998)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/spectra-h2o-co2-15um.pngSpectra-H2O-CO2-15umFrom the HITRANS database from spectralcalc.comhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/dlr-alicesprings-2000-4days1.pngDLR-AliceSprings-2000-4daysForgan, Bruce (2007): Basic measurements of radiation at station Alice Springs (2000-06)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/dlr-alicesprings-2000-06-4days2.pngDLR-AliceSprings-2000-06-4daysForgan, Bruce (2007): Basic measurements of radiation at station Alice Springs (2000-06)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/dlr-alicesprings-2000-4days.pngDLR-AliceSprings-2000-4daysForgan, Bruce (2007): Basic measurements of radiation at station Alice Springs (2000-01)2018-01-11T04:42:53+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/10/23/does-back-radiation-heat-the-ocean-part-two/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/ocean-heating-natural-convection-few-days-matlab.pngOcean-heating-natural-convection-few-days-Matlabhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/ocean-heating-no-convection-few-days-matlab1.pngOcean-heating-no-convection-few-days-MatlabA Flawed Modelhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/ocean-heating-no-convection-matlab3.pngOcean-heating-no-convection-Matlabhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/ocean-heating-no-convection-few-days-matlab.pngOcean-heating-no-convection-few-days-Matlabhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/ocean-heating-no-convection-matlab2.pngOcean-heating-no-convection-Matlab2026-02-21T07:02:27+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/12/05/does-back-radiation-heat-the-ocean-part-three/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/ocean-temp-profiles-table-kawai-wada-2007.pngOcean-temp-profiles-table-Kawai-Wada-2007https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/ocean-temp-profiles-2-kawai-wada-2007.pngOcean-temp-profiles-2-Kawai-Wada-2007from Kawai & Wada (2007)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/large-pond.pnglarge-pondhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/ocean-temp-profiles-price-weller-1986.pngOcean-temp-profiles-Price-Weller-1986Price & Weller (1986)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/ocean-temp-profiles-kawai-wada-2007.pngOcean-temp-profiles-Kawai-Wada-2007Kawai & Wada (2007)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/ocean-temp-profiles-3-soloviev-lukas-1997.pngOcean-temp-profiles-3-Soloviev-Lukas-1997Soloviev & Lukas (1997)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/ocean-temp-profiles-2-soloviev-lukas-1997.pngOcean-temp-profiles-2-Soloviev-Lukas-1997Soloviev & Lukas (1997)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/ocean-diurnal-heating-vs-wind-speed-deschamps-1984.pngOcean-diurnal-heating-vs-wind-speed-Deschamps-1984From Deschamps & Frouin (1984)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/ocean-temp-profiles-soloviev-lukas-1997.pngOcean-temp-profiles-Soloviev-Lukas-1997From Soloviev & Lukas (1997)2011-06-15T12:24:10+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2011/01/02/heat-transfer-basics-convection-part-one/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/boundary-layer-earth-surface.pngboundary-layer-earth-surfacehttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/convection-isothermal-plate.pngconvection-isothermal-platehttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/convection-isothermal-plate-499px.pngconvection-isothermal-plate-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/vortex-street-animation.gifVortex-street-animationfrom http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reynolds_numberhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/convection-basics-laminar-turbulence.pngconvection-basics-laminar-turbulencehttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/convection-basics-3.pngconvection-basics-3https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/convection-basics-2.pngconvection-basics-2https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/convection-basics-1b.pngconvection-basics-1bhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/convection-basics-1.pngconvection-basics-1From Incropera & DeWitt (2007)2015-10-08T19:17:18+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/12/30/curious-confusion-about-blackbodies/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/heat-transfer-radiation-4-gregory-sanford.pngHeat-Transfer-Radiation-4-Gregory-Sanfordhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/heat-transfer-radiation-3-gregory-sanford.pngHeat-Transfer-Radiation-3-Gregory-Sanfordhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/heat-transfer-radiation-2-gregory-sanford.pngHeat-Transfer-Radiation-2-Gregory-Sanfordhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/blackbody-confusion-e-0-6.pngblackbody-confusion-e-0.6https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/blackbody-confusion-e-1.pngblackbody-confusion-e-12011-01-05T21:18:27+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/12/27/emissivity-of-the-ocean/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/emissivity-vs-angle-and-refractive-index.pngEmissivity-vs-angle-and-refractive-indexhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/sea-surface-emissivity-lge-sidran-1981.pngsea-surface-emissivity-lge-sidran-1981https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/sea-surface-emissivity-sidran-1981.pngsea-surface-emissivity-sidran-1981https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/remote-sensing-environment-sea-surface-emissivity-499px.pngremote-sensing-environment-sea-surface-emissivity-499pxRemote Sensing of Environment - search resultshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/sea-surface-emissivity-results-different-view-angles-smith-19961.pngsea-surface-emissivity-results-different-view-angles-smith-1996From Smith et al (1996)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/sea-surface-emissivity-results-different-view-angles-smith-1996.pngsea-surface-emissivity-results-different-view-angles-smith-1996From Smith et al (1996)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/sea-surface-emissivity-smith-1996.pngsea-surface-emissivity-smith-1996From Smith et al (1996)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/sea-surface-reflections-henderson-2003.pngSea-surface-reflections-Henderson-2003Henderson (2003)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/konda-1994.pngkonda-1994Konda (1994)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/sea-surface-emissivity-radiance-niclos-2004.pngsea-surface-emissivity-radiance-niclos-20042017-02-01T03:14:30+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/12/17/azimuth/2010-12-27T23:51:57+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/02/10/co2-%e2%80%93-an-insignificant-trace-gas-part-five/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/ramanathan-coakley-1978-role-of-co2.pngramanathan-coakley-1978-role-of-CO2Extract from Ramanathan & Coakley (1978) - Relative contribution of H2O, CO2 and O3https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/longwave-upward-flux-clear-sky1.pngLongwave-upward-flux-clear-skyUpward Longwave Radiation, Numbers from Kiehl & Trenberth (1997)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/longwave-upward-flux-clear-sky.pngLongwave-upward-flux-clear-skyLongwave Flux - Clear Sky. Numbers from Kiehl & Trenberth (1997)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/fea_impeller.jpgfea_impellerStress analysis in an impeller2019-05-27T08:36:04+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/12/07/things-climate-science-has-totally-missed-convection/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/goody-convection-extract-19721.pngGoody-convection-extract-1972https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/goody-convection-extract-1972.pngGoody-convection-extract-19722010-12-23T17:02:16+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/12/04/do-trenberth-and-kiehl-understand-the-first-law-of-thermodynamics-part-three-and-a-half-%e2%80%93-the-creation-of-energy/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/conducted-heat-vs-r1-ifl.pngConducted-heat-vs-r1-IFLhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/conducted-heat-vs-r1-rfl.pngConducted-heat-vs-r1-RFL2011-02-26T09:37:31+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/11/22/and-the-woody-guthrie-award-goes-to/2010-11-25T06:51:25+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/10/06/does-back-radiation-heat-the-ocean-part-one/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/dlr-absorption-ocean-matlab.pngDLR-absorption-ocean-Matlabhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/dlr-spectrum-pacific-lubin-1995.pngDLR-Spectrum-Pacific-Lubin-1995Pacific, Lubin (1995)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/from-light-absorption-in-sea-water-2-wozniak-2007-499px.pngFrom Light Absorption in Sea Water -2- Wozniak - 2007-499pxFrom "Light Absorption in Sea Water", Wozniak (2007)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/from-light-absorption-in-sea-water-wozniak-2007-499px.pngFrom Light Absorption in Sea Water - Wozniak - 2007-499pxFrom "Light Absorption in Sea Water", Wozniak (2007)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/solar-absorption-ocean-matlab-499px.pngSolar-absorption-ocean-Matlab-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/beer_lambert-example1.pngBeer_lambert-example1https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/ocean-absorption-10nm-1mm-wikipedia-499px.pngOcean-absorption-10nm-1mm-wikipedia-499pxAbsorption coefficient for the ocean - Wikipediahttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/dlr-ocean-temp-change.pngDLR-Ocean-temp-changehttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/dlr-ocean-graphic.pngDLR-ocean-graphichttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/dlr-ocean-rad.pngDLR-Ocean-Rad2021-09-03T12:26:43+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/08/05/do-trenberth-and-kiehl-understand-the-first-law-of-thermodynamics-part-two/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/conducted-heat-1st-law-dynamic-temp1.pngConducted-heat-1st-law-dynamic-temp2011-07-25T07:06:44+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/07/26/do-trenberth-and-kiehl-understand-the-first-law-of-thermodynamics/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/conducted-heat-1st-law-a2.pngConducted-heat-1st-law-a2023-03-01T02:49:12+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/11/14/do-trenberth-and-kiehl-understand-the-first-law-of-thermodynamics-part-three-the-creation-of-energy/2018-04-07T18:10:03+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/06/12/venusian-mysteries/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/venus-rte-solution-outgoing-radiation-bullock-2001.pngVenus-rte-solution-outgoing-radiation-Bullock-2001https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/venus-rte-solution-bullock-2001.pngVenus-rte-solution-Bullock-2001https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/two-slab-climate-model.pngTwo-slab-climate-modelSimple climate model - atmosphere perfectly transparent to solar radiation, and totally opaque in the infra-redhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/energy-budget-trenberth-kiehl-1997.pngEnergy-budget-Trenberth-Kiehl-1997From Trenberth and Kiehl (1997)2021-02-27T21:21:50+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/06/22/venusian-mysteries-part-two/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/venus-heating-from-outside.pngVenus-heating-from-outside2010-11-13T19:44:17+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/11/12/interesting-refutation-of-some-basics/2010-11-15T20:22:37+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/11/05/the-three-body-problem/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/2-body-with-without-real-2nd-law.png2-body-with-without-real-2nd-lawhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/3-body-problem-21.png3-body-problem-2https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/3-body-problem-2.png3-body-problem-2https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/3-body-problem.png3-body-problem2012-02-08T21:14:00+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/11/01/theory-and-experiment-atmospheric-radiation/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/goody-rte-highlight.pngGoody-RTE-highlighthttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/radiation-transfer-diagram.pngRadiation-transfer-diagramhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/dessler-olr-ceres-vs-theory.pngDessler-OLR-Ceres-vs-theoryFrom Dessler et al (2008)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/goody-rte.pngGoody-RTEhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/goody-1989-clear-sky-spectrum2-499px.pngGoody-1989-clear-sky-spectrum2-499pxFrom Atmospheric Radiation, Goody (1989)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/goody-1989-clear-sky-spectrum1.pngGoody-1989-clear-sky-spectrum1https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/goody-1989-clear-sky-spectrum1-499px.pngGoody-1989-clear-sky-spectrum1-499pxFrom Atmospheric Radiation, Goody (1989)2023-10-21T08:35:45+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/10/24/planck-stefan-boltzmann-kirchhoff-and-lte/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/planck-spectral-intensity-air-vs-vacuum-expanded.pngPlanck-spectral-intensity-air-vs-vacuum-expandedhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/planck-spectral-intensity-air-vs-vacuum.pngPlanck-spectral-intensity-air-vs-vacuumhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/planck-1000k-300k.pngPlanck-1000K-300Khttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/hemispherical-radiation-from-planar-surface.pnghemispherical-radiation-from-planar-surfaceHemispherical Radiation, Incropera and DeWitt (2007)2017-03-27T20:19:59+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/04/09/sensible-heat-latent-heat-and-radiation/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/temperature-profile-various-timesofday-color-robinson-499px.pngTemperature-profile-various-timesofday-color-Robinson-499pxTemperature profiles throughout the day, Robinson (1999)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/surface-energy-budgets-p41-thermal-properties-robinson.pngSurface-energy-budgets-p41-thermal-properties-Robinsonhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/surface-energy-budgets-p41-temperature-in-soil-robinson-499px.pngSurface-energy-budgets-p41-temperature-in-soil-Robinson-499pxTemperature at two depths in soil - annual variation, Robinson (1999)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/surface-energy-budgets-p42-color-robinson-499px.pngSurface-energy-budgets-p42-color-Robinson-499pxSurface Heat Components in 3 Locations, Robinson (1999)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/surface-radiation-budgets-p35-cloudysky-color-robinson-499px.pngSurface-radiation-budgets-p35-cloudysky-color-Robinson-499pxCloudy skyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/surface-radiation-budgets-p35-clearsky-color-robinson-499px.pngSurface-radiation-budgets-p35-clearsky-color-Robinson-499pxClear skyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/surface-radiation-budgets-p35-color-robinson-499px.pngSurface-radiation-budgets-p35-color-Robinson-499pxSurface Radiation - clear day and cloudy day, from Robinson (1999)2016-08-25T15:07:38+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/04/24/tropospheric-basics/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/convective-vs-radiative-temperature-profile-taylor.pngConvective-vs-radiative-temperature-profile-Taylorhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/hydrostatic-balance-equation.pngHydrostatic-balance-equationhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/hydrostatic-balance-taylor-2005.pngHydrostatic-balance-Taylor-2005https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/pressure-vs-height-taylor1.pngPressure-vs-Height-TaylorPressure vs Height, Taylor (2005)2014-02-05T19:45:25+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/04/28/the-strange-case-of-stratospheric-water-vapor-non-linearities-and-groceries/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/stratospheric-water-vapor-measured-vs-latitude.pngStratospheric-water-vapor-measured-vs-latitudeStratospheric water vapor change, measured vs latitude, Solomon (2010)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/stratospheric-water-vapor-measured-tropical-1985-2010.pngStratospheric-water-vapor-measured-tropical-1985-2010Stratospheric water vapor measured tropical, 1985-2010, Solomon (2010)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/stratospheric-water-vapor-measured-1980-2010.pngStratospheric-water-vapor-measured-1980-2010Stratospheric water vapor measured 40'N, 1980-2010, Solomon (2010)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/stratospheric-water-vapor-effect-highlighted-499px.pngStratospheric-water-vapor-effect-highlighted-499pxStratospheric water vapor - SW and LW effect vs altitude2016-05-14T10:42:47+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/05/08/radiation-basics-and-the-imaginary-second-law-of-thermodynamics/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/spectral-intensity-1000k.pngSpectral-intensity-1000Khttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/planck-equation.pngPlanck-equationhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/reflectivityvs-wavelength-various-surfaces-incropera-2007-499px.pngReflectivityvs-wavelength-various-surfaces-Incropera-2007-499pxReflectivity vs wavelength for various surfaces, Incropera (2007)2017-09-19T13:54:33+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/05/12/co2-an-insignificant-trace-gas-part-eight-saturation/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/pressure-and-height-vs-temp-highlight-bigg-2005-350px.pngPressure-and-Height-vs-Temp-highlight-Bigg-2005-350pxPressure and height vs temperature, Bigg 2005https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/planck-288-220.pngplanck-288-220Blackbody radiation at 288K (15'C) and 220K (-53'C)2021-01-13T02:25:47+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/05/21/intelligent-materials-and-the-imaginary-second-law-of-thermodynamics/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/planck-283-263.pngplanck-283-263Blackbody radiation curves for -10'C (263K) and +10'C (283K)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/planck-273k.pngplanck-273KBlackbody radiation at 273K (0'C)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/plant-absorptivity.jpgplant-absorptivityAbsorptivity and reflectivity of a plant2020-04-06T17:53:32+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/05/28/the-first-law-of-thermodynamics-meets-the-imaginary-second-law/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/temp-vs-time-2-body-plus-solar-expanded-vertical2.pngtemp-vs-time-2-body-plus-solar-expanded-verticalhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/temp-vs-time-2-body-plus-solar3.pngtemp-vs-time-2-body-plus-solarhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/temp-vs-time-2-body1.pngtemp-vs-time-2-bodyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/temp-vs-time-comparison-singlevsdual1.pngtemp-vs-time-comparison-singlevsdualhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/temp-vs-time-comparison-singlevsdual-expanded.pngtemp-vs-time-comparison-singlevsdual-expandedhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/temp-vs-time-2-body-plus-solar2.pngtemp-vs-time-2-body-plus-solarhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/temp-vs-time-2-body-plus-solar-expanded-vertical1.pngtemp-vs-time-2-body-plus-solar-expanded-verticalhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/temp-vs-time-1-star.pngtemp-vs-time-1-starhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/temp-vs-time-11.pngtemp-vs-time-1https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/temp-vs-time-2-body.pngtemp-vs-time-2-body2010-10-23T08:02:40+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/06/01/the-sun-and-max-planck-agree/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/solar-toa-and-earth-surface-taylor-2005.pngSolar-TOA-and-earth-surface-Taylor-2005Solar radiation at top of atmosphere and the earth's surface, Taylor (2005)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/solar-radiation-incropera-2007.pngSolar-radiation-Incropera-2007Solar Radiation and the Blackbody Curve for 5780K, Incropera (2007)2023-01-02T14:28:59+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/06/03/lunar-madness-and-physics-basics/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/moon-absorbed-emitted-5000000-c-e-1-0.pngMoon-absorbed-emitted-5000000-C-e-1.0https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/moon-absorbed-emitted-500000-c-e-1-0.pngMoon-absorbed-emitted-500000-C-e-1.0https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/moon-absorbed-emitted-50000-c-e-1-0.pngMoon-absorbed-emitted-50000-C-e-1.0https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/moon-absorbed-emitted-500000-c.pngMoon-absorbed-emitted-500000-Chttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/moon-absorbed-emitted-5000000-c.pngMoon-absorbed-emitted-5000000-Chttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/moon-absorbed-emitted-50000-c.pngMoon-absorbed-emitted-50000-Chttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/moon-trend-absorbedrad-vs-heatcap2.pngMoon-trend-AbsorbedRad-vs-heatcap-https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/moon-trend-absorbedrad-vs-heatcap1.pngMoon-trend-AbsorbedRad-vs-heatcap-https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/moon-trend-tmean-vs-heatcap-11.pngMoon-trend-Tmean-vs-heatcap-1https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/blackbody-radiation-e-vs-t-400k.pngBlackbody-radiation-E-vs-T-400K2014-09-11T05:43:33+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/06/05/the-hoover-incident/2010-10-23T07:59:20+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/07/25/the-sun-and-max-planck-agree-part-two/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/planck-300-to-5780-toa-lin-typ-albedo-45.pngplanck-300-to-5780-TOA-lin-typ-albedo-45https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/planck-300-to-5780-toa-log-typ-albedo-453.pngplanck-300-to-5780-TOA-log-typ-albedo-45https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/planck-300-to-5780-toa-log.pngplanck-300-to-5780-TOA-loghttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/planck-300-to-5780-linear1.pngplanck-300-to-5780-linearhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/planck-300-to-5780-log-21.pngplanck-300-to-5780-log-2https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/planck-300-to-5780-log-2.pngplanck-300-to-5780-log-2https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/planck-300-to-5780-log.pngplanck-300-to-5780-loghttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/planck-300-to-5780-linear.pngplanck-300-to-5780-linear2014-05-06T14:09:40+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/08/08/vanishing-nets/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/grey-model-flux-inc-sw-z3.pngGrey-model-flux-inc-sw-zhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/grey-model-flux-optical-depth1.pngGrey-model-flux-optical-depthhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/grey-model-flux-z1.pngGrey-model-flux-zhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/grey-model-temp-optical-depth.pngGrey-model-temp-optical-depthhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/grey-model-temp-z.pngGrey-model-temp-z2010-10-22T01:41:47+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/08/11/darwinian-selection-back-radiation/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/dlr-darwin-200306-499px.pngDLR-Darwin-200306-499pxLong, Charles (2009): Basic measurements of radiation at station Darwinhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/dlr-darwin-200305-499px.pngDLR-Darwin-200305-499pxLong, Charles (2009): Basic measurements of radiation at station Darwinhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/dlr-darwin-200304-499px.pngDLR-Darwin-200304-499pxLong, Charles (2009): Basic measurements of radiation at station Darwinhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/dlr-darwin-200303-499px.pngDLR-Darwin-200303-499pxLong, Charles (2009): Basic measurements of radiation at station Darwinhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/dlr-darwin-200302-499px.pngDLR-Darwin-200302-499pxLong, Charles (2009): Basic measurements of radiation at station Darwinhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/dlr-darwin-200301-499px.pngDLR-Darwin-200301-499pxLong, Charles (2009): Basic measurements of radiation at station Darwinhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/dlr-darwin-2003-499px.pngDLR-Darwin-2003-499pxLong, Charles (2009): Basic measurements of radiation at station Darwin2019-10-12T10:22:20+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/08/15/height-of-emission-of-olr-and-dlr/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/pressure-vs-height-matlab.pngPressure-vs-Height-Matlabhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/effective-emission-level-lindzen-1999.pngEffective-emission-level-Lindzen-1999Tropospheric Water Vapor and Climate Sensitivity, Schneider (1999)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/effective-emission-level-lindzen-1999-499px.pngEffective-emission-level-Lindzen-1999-499pxFrom "Tropospheric Water Vapor and Climate Sensitivity" by Schneider et al (1999)2013-07-30T17:40:16+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/08/16/convection-venus-thought-experiments-and-tall-rooms-full-of-gas/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/potential-temp-equation1.pngpotential-temp-equationhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/potential-temp-equation.pngpotential-temp-equationhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/energy-budget-trenberth-kiehl-1997a1.pngEnergy-budget-Trenberth-Kiehl-1997aFrom Kiehl & Trenberth (1997)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/energy-budget-trenberth-kiehl-1997a.pngEnergy-budget-Trenberth-Kiehl-1997aFrom Kiehl & Trenberth (1997)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/venus-k-t-comparison.pngVenus-K-T-comparisonhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/arthur-3.pngarthur-3https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/arthur-2.pngarthur-2https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/arthur-1.pngarthur-1https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/adiabatic.pngadiabaticAdiabatic Compression, Thermal Physics, Schroederhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/isotherm.pngisothermIsothermal compression, Thermal Physics - Schroeder2015-01-30T08:11:42+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/09/12/heat-transfer-basics-part-zero/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/heat-transfer-conduction-radiation-3dgraph-e-const-a.pngHeat-transfer-conduction-radiation-3Dgraph-e-const-ahttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/heat-transfer-conduction-radiation-3dgraph-e-const-a-499px.pngHeat-transfer-conduction-radiation-3Dgraph-e-const-a-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/heat-transfer-conduction-radiation-3dgraph-e.pngHeat-transfer-conduction-radiation-3Dgraph-ehttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/heat-transfer-conduction-radiation-3dgraph-e-499px.pngHeat-transfer-conduction-radiation-3Dgraph-e-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/heat-transfer-conduction-radiation-3dgraph.pngHeat-transfer-conduction-radiation-3Dgraphhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/heat-transfer-conduction-radiation-3dgraph-499px.pngHeat-transfer-conduction-radiation-3Dgraph-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/heat-transfer-conduction-radiation-graph-t2-283k.pngHeat-transfer-conduction-radiation-graph-T2-283Khttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/heat-transfer-thinwall-0-2-radiation-25c.pngHeat-transfer-thinwall-0.2-radiation-25Chttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/heat-transfer-thinwall-0-2-radiation-10c.pngHeat-transfer-thinwall-0.2-radiation-10Chttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/heat-transfer-thinwall-radiation-10c.pngHeat-transfer-thinwall-radiation-10C2024-12-23T23:24:55+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/09/17/on-missing-the-point-by-chilingar-et-al-2008/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/davies-convection.pngDavies-ConvectionDavies, Atmospheric Physicshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/hewitt-jackson-convection-2003.pngHewitt-Jackson-convection-2003From Handbook of Atmospheric Science, Hewitt and Jackson (2003)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/taylor-convection-extract.pngTaylor-convection-extractExtract from Elementary Climate Physics, F.W. Taylor (2005)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/houghton-contents1.pngHoughton-contentshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/taylor-contents.pngTaylor-Contentshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/goody-contents.pngGoody-contentshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/houghton-contents.pngHoughton-contents2010-10-22T01:34:29+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/09/27/the-real-second-law-of-thermodynamics/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/second-law-1911.pngsecond-law-1911https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/second-law-1-3.pngsecond-law-1-3https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/second-law1-21.pngsecond-law1-2https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/second-law1-2.pngsecond-law1-2https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/second-law1-1.pngsecond-law1-1https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/second-law-4.pngsecond-law-4https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/second-law-01.pngsecond-law-0https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/second-law-31.pngsecond-law-3https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/second-law-21.pngsecond-law-2https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/second-law-11.pngsecond-law-12025-07-06T21:01:40+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/10/02/absorption-of-radiation-from-different-temperature-sources/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/absorption-10c-10c-sources-2.pngAbsorption-10'C--10'C-sources-2https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/absorption-10c-10c-sources.pngAbsorption-10'C--10'C-sourceshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/planck-10c-10c.pngPlanck-10C--10C2010-12-26T16:21:04+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/10/07/amazing-things-we-find-in-textbooks-the-real-second-law-of-thermodynamics/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/second-law-book-siegel-howell-3.pngSecond-law-book-Siegel-Howell-3https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/second-law-book-siegel-howell.pngSecond-law-book-Siegel-Howellhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/second-law-book-siegel-howell-2.pngSecond-law-book-Siegel-Howell-2https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/second-law-book-incropera-dewitt-2007-title.pngSecond-law-book-Incropera-DeWitt-2007-titlehttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/second-law-book-incropera-dewitt-2007.pngSecond-law-book-Incropera-DeWitt-2007https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/second-law-book-kreith.pngSecond-law-book-Kreithhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/second-law-book-kreith-title.pngSecond-law-book-Kreith-titlehttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/second-law-book-jacok.pngSecond-law-book-Jacokhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/second-law-book-jacok-title.pngSecond-law-book-Jacok-titlehttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/second-law-book-ozisik.pngSecond-law-book-Ozisik2021-01-19T08:57:30+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/10/14/updated-roadmap-and-simple-models/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/absorptance.pngAbsorptancehttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/sourcefunction-taylor.pngsourcefunction-taylorFrom Vardavas & Taylor (2007)2010-10-21T03:24:38+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/roadmap/co2/2021-05-03T19:22:04+00:00weekly0.6https://scienceofdoom.com/2010/08/22/heat-transfer-basics-and-non-radiative-atmospheres/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/heat-transfer-hoover-graphs-2.pngHeat-transfer-Hoover-graphs-2https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/heat-transfer-hoover-graphs-2-499px.pngHeat-transfer-Hoover-graphs-2-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/heat-transfer-hoover-graphs-1.pngHeat-transfer-Hoover-graphs-1https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/heat-transfer-hoover-graphs-1-499px.pngHeat-transfer-Hoover-graphs-1-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/heat-transfer-hoover-2a.pngHeat-transfer-Hoover-2ahttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/heat-transfer-hoover-1a.pngHeat-transfer-Hoover-1a2017-03-20T10:11:19+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/02/15/co2-cant-have-that-effect-because/2022-07-17T23:15:04+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/08/06/updated-co2-an-insignificant-trace-gas-part-one/2010-08-06T07:47:26+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/02/11/co2-%e2%80%93-an-insignificant-trace-gas-part-six-visualization/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/longwave-downward-radiation-surface-summer-evans.pngLongwave-downward-radiation-surface-Summer-EvansDownwards Longwave Radiation at the Earth's Surface, Summerhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/longwave-downward-radiation-surface-measured-vs-simulated-evans.pngLongwave-downward-radiation-surface-measured-vs-simulated-EvansMeasured vs Simulated Downward Longwave Radiation at the Surface, Evans & Puckrinhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/longwave-downward-radiation-surface-evans1.pngLongwave-downward-radiation-surface-EvansDownwards Longwave Radiation at the Earth's Surface, From Evans & Puckrinhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/olr-200906-globe-499px.pngOLR-200906-globe-499pxMeasured Outgoing Longwave Radiation at the top of atmosphere, June 2009https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/olr-200906-globe.pngOLR-200906-globeMeasured Outgoing Longwave Radiation at the top of atmosphere, June 2009https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/longwave-downward-radiation-surface-evans.pngLongwave-downward-radiation-surface-EvansDownwards Longwave Radiation at the Earth's Surface, From Evans & Puckrin2017-01-21T23:26:06+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2009/11/22/temperature-history/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/holmes-mwp-lia2.pngHolmes-mwp-lia2From "Holmes' Principles of Physical Geology" 4th Ed. 1993https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/holmes-eemian.pngHolmes-EemianFrom "Holmes' Principles of Physical Geology" 4th Ed. 1993https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/holmes-1myears.pngHolmes-1MyearsFrom "Holmes' Principles of Physical Geology" 4th Ed. 1993https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/tar2001-1000years.pngTAR2001-1000yearsFrom IPCC Third Assessment Reporthttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/holmes-mwp-lia.pngHolmes-mwp-liaFrom "Holmes' Principles of Physical Geology" 4th Ed.2018-06-08T10:15:12+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/07/04/the-earths-energy-budget-part-four-albedo/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/sw-reflected-global-by-season-erbe-hatzianastassiou-2004-499px1.pngSW-reflected-global-by-season-ERBE-Hatzianastassiou-2004-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/sw-reflected-global-by-season-erbe-hatzianastassiou-2004-499px.pngSW-reflected-global-by-season-ERBE-Hatzianastassiou-2004-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/sw-reflected-comparison-by-location-model-erbe-hatzianastassiou-2004-499px.pngSW-reflected-comparison-by-location-Model-ERBE-Hatzianastassiou-2004-499pxhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/sw-reflected-comparison-model-erbe-hatzianastassiou-2004.pngSW-reflected-comparison-Model-ERBE-Hatzianastassiou-2004https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/solar-in-out-albedo-timeseries-hatzianastassiou-2004-499px.pngSolar-In-Out-Albedo-TimeSeries-Hatzianastassiou-2004-499pxTime series changes in solar radiation and albedo, Hatzianastassiou (2004)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/solar-in-out-albedo-timeseries-hatzianastassiou-2004.pngSolar-In-Out-Albedo-TimeSeries-Hatzianastassiou-2004Time series data from the model, Hatzianastassiou (2004)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/sw-in-out-and-albedo-vs-latitude-hatzianastassiou-2004-499px.pngSW-in-out-and-albedo-vs-latitude-Hatzianastassiou-2004-499pxShortwave received and reflected plus albedo, Hatzianastassiou (2004)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/albedo-hatzianastassiou-2004-499px.pngAlbedo-Hatzianastassiou-2004-499pxfrom Hatzianastassiou (2004)2016-06-20T20:31:17+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/02/06/the-earths-energy-budget-part-one/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/solar-disc-surfacearea-taylor.pngSolar-disc-surfacearea-TaylorSolar radiation received against a "2d disc"https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/tsi-78-99-400px.pngTSI-78-99-400pxSolar Radiation Received - measured by Satellites2019-07-27T10:26:51+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/03/15/the-imaginary-second-law-of-thermodynamics/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/longwave-upward-flux-clear-sky.pngLongwave-upward-flux-clear-sky2024-04-01T15:26:19+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/02/19/co2-an-insignificant-trace-gas-part-seven-the-boring-numbers/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/log-graph-myhre-co2.pnglog-graph-Myhre-CO2Radiative Forcing vs CO2 concentration, Myhre et al (1998)2022-06-25T11:15:21+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/05/19/the-woody-guthrie-award/2010-08-02T13:55:28+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/04/05/on-the-miseducation-of-the-uninformed-by-gerlich-and-scheuschner-2009/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/longwave-downward-radiation-surface-evans.pngLongwave-downward-radiation-surface-EvansCanada, Evans (2006)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/gerlich-2nd-law-2.pnggerlich-2nd-law-2https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/gerlich-2nd-law.pnggerlich-2nd-lawhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/fundamentals-of-heat-and-mass-transfer-chapter-12-radiation.pngFundamentals-of-heat-and-mass-transfer-Chapter-12-RadiationFrom "Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer, 6th edition", Incropera and DeWitt (2007)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/gerlich-rte.pnggerlich-RTEhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/gerlich-solar-breakdown.pnggerlich-solar-breakdownSolar Radiation Breakdown2022-05-09T14:30:26+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/03/30/how-much-work-can-one-molecule-do/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/molecular-speed.pngMolecular-speedhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/co2-absorption-15-5-15-6-log1.pngCO2-absorption-15-5-15-6-logO2 and N2 added..https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/co2-absorption-15-5-15-6-linear.pngCO2-absorption-15-4-15-6-linearCO2 absorption, 15.4-15.6um, linear, from spectralcalc.comhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/co2-absorption-15-5-15-6-log.pngCO2-absorption-15-5-15-6-logCO2 absorption - log graph - 15.4-15.6um, from spectralcalc.com2010-07-19T16:31:16+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/04/07/the-dull-case-of-emissivity-and-average-temperatures/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/emissivity-vs-wavelength-various-substances2.pngEmissivity-vs-wavelength-various-substances2Emissivity vs wavelength of various substances, Wilber (1999)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/emissivity-vs-wavelength-various-substances.pngEmissivity-vs-wavelength-various-substancesEmissivity vs wavelength for various substances, Wilber (1999)2023-04-13T00:42:58+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/03/14/on-having-a-laugh-by-gerlich-and-tscheuschner-2009/2010-05-07T20:20:04+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/03/28/co2-in-the-solar-spectrum/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/net-longwave-absorption-ghg-increase-collins.pngNet-longwave-absorption-GHG-increase-CollinsLongwave radiative forcing from increases in various "greenhouse" gaseshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/net-solar-absorption-ghg-increase.pngNet-solar-absorption-GHG-increaseNet absorption of solar radiation by various "greenhouse" gaseshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/planck-12-18um-scaled-0-3-overlaid-co2-absorption.pngplanck-12-18um-scaled-0.3-overlaid-CO2-absorptionCO2 absorption in the 12-18um band, with terrestrial spectrum overlaidhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/planck-0-5um-overlaid-co2-absorption.pngplanck-0-5um-overlaid-CO2-absorptionCO2 absorption in the 0.17-5um band, with solar spectrum overlaid2019-05-27T08:32:06+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/03/27/american-thinker-smoking-gun-gary-thompsons-comments-examined/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/ramanathan-coakley-1978-p7.pngRamanathan-Coakley-1978-p7A few equations from Ramanathan and Coakley, p7https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/ramanathan-coakley-1978-p4.pngRamanathan-Coakley-1978-p4A small part of solving the radiative-convective equations, Ramanathan & Coakley (1978)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/blackbody-radiation-288k-289k-closeup-499px.pngBlackbody-radiation-288K-289K-closeup-499pxClose up of the peak energy of 288K and 289Khttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/blackbody-radiation-288k-289k-499px.pngBlackbody-radiation-288K-289K-499pxBlackbody Radiation at 288K and 289K (15'C and 16'C)2010-05-14T20:51:22+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/03/23/models-on-and-off-the-catwalk-part-two/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/allmodel-error-olr-by-lat-compared-all-models.pngAllmodel-error-OLR-by-lat-compared-all-modelsOLR vs latitude - Model error for all modelshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/actual-average-olr-by-lat-compared-all-models.pngActual-average-OLR-by-lat-compared-all-modelsOLR vs latitude - Observed compared with all modelshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/allmodel-error-reflected-sw-by-lat-compared-all-models1.pngAllmodel-error-reflected-SW-by-lat-compared-all-modelsReflected Solar Radiation vs latitude - Model error for all modelshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/actual-average-reflected-sw-by-lat-compared-all-models1.pngActual-average-reflected-SW-by-lat-compared-all-modelsReflected Solar Radiation vs latitude - Observed compared with all modelshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/ccsm3-meanmodel-specific-humidity-percent-error.pngCCSM3-MeanModel-Specific-Humidity-Percent-ErrorSpecific Humidity - % Error for CCSM3 and ensemblehttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/actual-average-specific-humidity.pngActual-average-specific-humiditySpecific Humidity vs Latitude and Altitude, from ERA40https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/actual-average-rainfall-by-lat-compared-all-models.pngActual-average-rainfall-by-lat-compared-all-modelsRainfall vs latitude - Observed vs all modelshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/ccsm3-meanmodel-rainfall-actual-less-model.pngCCSM3-MeanModel-Rainfall-Actual-less-ModelRainfall - Actual less Model for CCSM3 and ensemblehttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/actual-average-rainfall-cmap.pngActual-average-rainfall-CMAPRainfall 1980-1999https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/ccsm3-meanmodel-olr-actual-less-model.pngCCSM3-MeanModel-OLR-Actual-less-ModelOLR - Actual less Model for CCSM3 and ensemble2016-10-11T00:14:47+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/02/27/models-on-and-off-the-catwalk-part-one/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/model-1957-1990-ocean-potential-temp-vs-actual.pngModel-1957-1990-Ocean-potential-temp-vs-actualOcean potential temperature and model error 1957-1990https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/model-1980-99-rainfall-vs-actual.pngModel-1980-99-Rainfall-vs-ActualActual Rainfall vs Model Rainfall, 1980-99https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/model-1980-99-std-deviation-temp-minus-model-std-deviation.pngModel-1980-99-std-deviation-temp-minus-model-std-deviation1980-1999 Temperature range in each location and Model error in temperature rangehttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/models-1980-99-temperature-vs-actual.pngModels-1980-99-Temperature-vs-ActualActual 1980-1999 temperature (top) and Model error from actual (bottom)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/models-20c-ensemble-vs-actual.pngModels-20C-ensemble-vs-actual20th century temperature hindcast vs actual - ensemble2022-07-25T12:51:21+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/02/18/the-earth%e2%80%99s-energy-budget-%e2%80%93-part-two/2021-04-23T23:53:14+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/03/21/the-earth%e2%80%99s-energy-budget-%e2%80%93-part-three/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/radiation-from-different-higher-layers-atmosphere-499px.pngRadiation-from-different-higher-layers-atmosphere-499pxRadiation from different heights in the atmosphere, illustrative values onlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/radiation-from-different-higher-layers-atmosphere.pngRadiation-from-different-higher-layers-atmosphereRadiation from different heights in the atmosphere, illustrative values onlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/pressure-and-height-vs-temp-highlight-bigg-2005.pngPressure-and-Height-vs-Temp-highlight-Bigg-2005Atmospheric Temperature & Pressure Profile, Bigg (2005)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/blackbody-radiation-323k-transmittance-8-141.pngBlackbody-radiation-323K-transmittance-8-14323K radiation through a perfect "atmospheric window", 8-14umhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/blackbody-radiation-323k-transmittance-8-14.pngBlackbody-radiation-323K-transmittance-8-14323K radiation through a perfect "atmospheric window", 8-14umhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/blackbody-radiation-255k-transmittance.pngBlackbody-radiation-255K-transmittance255K radiation, 100% transmittancehttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/radiation-earth-from-space-taylor-499px.pngRadiation-Earth-from-space-Taylor-499pxOutgoing longwave radiation at TOA, Taylor (2005)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/blackbody-radiation-288k2.pngBlackbody-radiation-288KBlackbody Radiation at 15'C or 288Khttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/blackbody-radiation-288k1.pngBlackbody-radiation-288Khttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/blackbody-radiation-288k.pngBlackbody-radiation-288K2020-03-25T22:53:56+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/03/10/american-thinker-the-difference-between-a-smoking-gun-and-a-science-paper/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/brindley-west-comparison-full-model-vs-data.pngBrindley-West-Comparison-full-model-vs-dataComparison, West Pacific, Observed (top) vs Model (bottom)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/brindley-east-comparison-full-model-vs-data.pngBrindley-East-Comparison-full-model-vs-dataComparison on similar vertical axes - top, observed; bottom, modelhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/brindley-west-model-with-sst-temp-profile-humidity.pngBrindley-West-model-with-SST-temp-profile-humidityModel results for West Pacifichttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/brindley-east-model-with-sst-temp-profile-humidity.pngBrindley-East-model-with-SST-temp-profile-humidityTop - model results not including trace gases; Bottom - model results including all effectshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/brindley-humidity-profile-499px.pngBrindley-humidity-profile-499pxChange in Humidity Profile through the atmosphere, Brindleyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/brindley-temp-profile-499px.pngBrindley-temp-profile-499pxAtmospheric Temperature Profile, Brindleyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/brindley-12.pngbrindley-1Spectral difference - 1997 less 1970 over East and West Pacific, Brindleyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/smoking-gun.pngsmoking-gunEven their mother couldn't tell them apart2010-03-27T03:03:03+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/03/06/the-real-measure-of-global-warming/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/xbt.pngXBTXBThttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/ocean-heat-change-3-depths-levitus2005.pngOcean-heat-change-3-depths-Levitus2005Ocean heat change, Levitus (2005)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/ohc-1948-1998-3000m-800m-300m-levitus-2000.pngOHC-1948-1998-3000m-800m-300m-Levitus-2000Comparison of OHC in top 3000m, top 800m, top 300m, Levitus (2000)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/ocean-temp-change-1750m-natlantic-levitus-2000.pngOcean-temp-change-1750m-NAtlantic-Levitus-2000Temperature comparison 1750m down. 1970-74 cf 55-59 & 1988-92 cf 70-74https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/ocean-heat-change-1955-1996-3000m-onetotal1.pngOcean-heat-change-1955-1996-3000m-OneTotalOcean heat change - global summary, Levitus (2000). Numbers in 10^22 Jhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/ocean-heat-change-1955-1996-3000m-onetotal.pngOcean-heat-change-1955-1996-3000m-OneTotalOcean heat change - global summary, Levitus (2000). [Numbers in 10^22 J]https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/ocean-temp-salinity-argo.pngOcean-temp-salinity-ArgoArgo profile, Temperature and Salinity vs Depthhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/ocean-heat-change-1955-1996-3000m1.pngOcean-heat-change-1955-1996-3000mOcean heat change, upper 3000m, 1955-1996, from Levitus (2000)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/ocean-heat-change-1955-1996-3000m.pngOcean-heat-change-1955-1996-3000mhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/ocean-temp-vs-depth1.pngOcean-temp-vs-depthOcean temperature vs depth in one location, Bigg (2003)2018-06-02T21:24:33+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/03/07/the-real-measure-of-global-warming-and-the-sad-case-of-the-expendable-bathythermographs/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/ocean-heat-change-1955-2009-700m-comparisonl2005-2009-levitus2009.pngOcean-heat-change-1955-2009-700m-ComparisonL2005-2009-Levitus2009Ocean heat change 1955- 2009 - Levitus (2009)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/ocean-heat-change-1955-2005-700m-domingues2008.pngOcean-heat-change-1955-2005-700m-Domingues2008OHC 1951-2004, Domingues (2008)2011-07-11T17:11:42+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/03/02/why-global-mean-surface-temperature-should-be-relegated/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/temperature-profile-troposphere.pngTemperature-profile-troposphereTypical temperature profile in the tropospherehttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/ocean-temp-vs-depth.pngOcean-temp-vs-depthOcean temperature vs depth, Grant Bigg, Oceans and Climate (2003)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/temperature-measurement-vs-windspeed-pielke.pngTemperature-measurement-vs-windspeed-Pielkehttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/japan-uhi-deltat-time-of-day.pngJapan-UHI-deltaT-time-of-dayTemperature change per decade: time of day vs population density2016-02-17T16:38:07+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/about/2024-01-03T08:37:49+00:00weekly0.6https://scienceofdoom.com/2010/02/24/radiative-forcing-thermal-lag-and-equilibrium-temperatures/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/simple-thermal-lag2.pngSimple-thermal-lagSimple Thermal Laghttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/simple-thermal-lag1.pngSimple-thermal-lagSimple Thermal Laghttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/simple-thermal-lag.pngSimple-thermal-lag2017-03-20T20:14:21+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/02/23/here-comes-the-sun/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/tsi-composite-1978-2005-frohlich.pngTSI-composite-1978-2005-FrohlichComposite TSI from satellite, 1978-2005, Frohlich & Leanhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/tsi-solanski-to-1870.pngTSI-Solanski-to-1870Second reconstruction of TSI back to 1870, Solanski & Fliggehttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/tsi-back-to-1700-ipcc-tar.pngTSI-back-to-1600-IPCC-TARReconstructions of TSI back to 1600, IPCC (2001)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/sun.pngsunThe Sunhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/tsi-back-to-1874.pngTSI-back-to-1874Reconstruction of changes in TSI, Solanski & Fliggehttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/climate.pngclimateEarth from Spacehttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/tsi-acrim.pngTSI-acrimTotal Solar Irradiation, as measured by various satellites2023-07-11T01:17:20+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/02/13/predictability-with-a-pinch-of-salt-please-part-one/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/density-vs-salinity-temperature-less-saline2.pngDensity-vs-Salinity-Temperature-less-SalineDensity Changes as Cold Seawater becomes less Salinehttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/thermohaline_circulation_nasa.jpgthermohaline_circulation_nasaThermohaline Circulationhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/density-vs-salinity-temperature-less-saline1.pngDensity-vs-Salinity-Temperature-less-SalineDensity Changes as Cold Seawater becomes less Salinehttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/density-vs-salinity-temperature-less-saline.pngDensity-vs-Salinity-Temperature-less-SalineDensity Changes as Cold Seawater becomes less Salinehttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/density-vs-salinity-temperature-taylor.pngDensity-vs-Salinity-Temperature-TaylorDensity vs Salinty and Temperature, Taylor (2005)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/energy_balance_erbe_1987-equator-poles.jpgenergy_balance_ERBE_1987-equator-polesEnergy Received and Radiated - by Latitudehttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/energy-transfer-to-poles-taylor.pngEnergy-transfer-to-poles-TaylorEnergy Transfer Polewards, by Oceans and Atmosphere, Taylor (2005)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/energy-transfer-to-poles-coe.pngEnergy-transfer-to-poles-CoeSolar Radiation vs Outgoing Longwave Radiation against Latitude, "Atmospheric Science for Environmental Scientists", Hewitt &Jackson2018-12-30T02:51:42+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2009/12/13/understanding-the-flaw/2013-06-29T02:28:57+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/01/04/warmest-decade-on-record-and-the-laymans-guide-to-autocorrelation/2020-03-18T23:15:29+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/01/26/the-ipcc-and-the-credibility-of-climate-science-2/2010-02-12T12:17:39+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/02/12/the-confirmation-bias-or-why-none-of-us-are-really-skeptics/2017-07-09T19:41:24+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/02/05/co2-an-insignificant-trace-gas-part-four/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/transmittance-beer_lambert11.pngTransmittance-Beer_lambert1Transmittance = I/Iohttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/transmittance-beer_lambert1.pngTransmittance-Beer_lambert1Transmittance = I/Iohttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/taylor-bandmodel-equation.pngTaylor-BandModel-equationRandom Band Model2020-01-17T21:28:11+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/01/31/co2-an-insignificant-trace-gas-part-three/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/radiative-equilibrium-grey-model-coe.pngRadiative-equilibrium-grey-model-CoeThe Grey Model of Radiative Equilibrium, from "Handbook of Atmospheric Science" Hewitt and Jackson (2003)https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/exp-function.pngexp-functionAbsorption of Radiation as "optical thickness" increases2019-05-27T08:35:00+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/01/20/co2-%e2%80%93-an-insignificant-trace-gas-part-two/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/symmetrical_stretching.gifSymmetrical_stretchinghttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/o2-h20-optical-thickness.pngO2-H20-Optical-ThicknessOptical Thickness of O2 and water vapor from www.atm.ox.ac.ukhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/o2-co2-optical-thickness.pngO2-CO2-Optical-ThicknessOptical Thickness of O2 and CO2 from www.atm.ox.ac.ukhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/co2-h2o-absorption-spectra-hitrans.pngCO2-H2O-absorption-spectra-HITRANSCO2 and water vapor absorption, by spectracalc.com from the HITRANS databasehttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/co2-h2o-atmospheric-concentration.pngCO2-H2O-atmospheric-concentrationCO2 and water vapor by volume, from "Spectral Calculator" databasehttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/co2-bands-hewitt.pngCO2-bands-HewittFrom "Handbook of Atmospheric Sciences", Hewitt & Jackson 20032020-03-06T08:15:05+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2009/12/19/is-climate-more-than-weather-is-weather-just-noise/2010-01-20T06:44:31+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/01/15/co2-lags-temperature-in-the-ice-core-record-doesnt-that-prove-the-ipcc-wrong/2016-08-31T15:39:49+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2010/01/17/urban-heat-island-in-japan/https://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/japan-uhi-delta-t-table.pngJapan-UHI-delta-T-tableTemperature delta from nearby rural areas vs population densityhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/japan-uhi-delta-t.pngJapan-UHI-delta-TEstimate of actual UHI by referencing the closest rural stations - again categorized by population densityhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/japan-uhi-mean-max-min.pngJapan-UHI-mean-max-minDependence of Tmean, Tmax and Tmin on population density for different regions in Japanhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/japan-uhi-table.pngJapan-UHI-tableThe effect of UHI demonstrated in various population densitieshttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/japan-uhi-tmean-pop.pngJapan-UHI-Tmean-popMean temperature anomaly vs population density, Japanhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/japan-tokyo-100yrs-uhi.pngJapan-Tokyo-100yrs-UHIhttps://scienceofdoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/ipcc-2007-temperature-150yrs.pngIPCC-2007-temperature-150yrs2010-05-07T11:36:49+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.com/2009/12/03/those-hazy-skeptics-at-the-ipcc/2015-04-28T19:25:37+00:00monthlyhttps://scienceofdoom.comdaily1.02026-02-21T07:02:27+00:00